New Use Cases For Bitcoin. Ordinal Theory Disturbs Bitcoin Purists. Competition For Ethereum? 

Bitcoin is evolving with the introduction of inscriptions, which has caused an explosion in innovation, creating new use cases for Bitcoin that many thought it would never advocate. Some believe these use cases are inappropriate for Bitcoin's primary mission of decentralizing money and being a store of value. These use cases include BRC-20 tokens, and Ordinal Inscriptions likened to an NFT called Digital Artifacts, and many are wondering whether they will compete with NFTs and ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum. 

This article illustrates what Inscriptions, Ordinals, and BRC-20 tokens are, how they work, and evaluates what impact the Ordinal theory could have on BTC. Also, how will these protocols impact Ethereum? Could ETH lose NFT market dominance as a result? 

When Did It All Start

The history of Bitcoin's recent innovations begins with the Taproot upgrade, which went live in November 2021. Essentially, Taproot removed limits on how much data each BTC transaction can use, allowing a single transaction to fill an entire Bitcoin block. This opened the door to attaching additional data to BTC transactions, including individual Satoshis. (Sats). For context, each BTC comprises 100 million Sats, like cents to a dollar. 

Image Source: Cointelegraph

As the name suggests, inscriptions make it possible to attach data to individual Sats, including audio, video, and text. Bitcoin Ordinal inscriptions can be fungible or non-fungible, depending on who owns the Ordinal and whether they wish to preserve the individual Satoshi. 

The concept of adding data to individual Sats isn't necessarily new. In fact, Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto and early Bitcoin developer Gavin Andresen discussed creating a domain name system on Bitcoin in 2010. This eventually led to the creation of Namecoin, one of the first Bitcoin forks. In 2012, the CEO of eToro proposed the concept of colored coins, which involves attaching data to BTC transactions to tokenize real-world assets effectively. 

The main reason why these concepts failed to reach mass adoption was because of data limits on BTC transactions, which Taproot has since removed. Another reason why these inscriptions failed to reach mass adoption was because it was challenging to create or keep track of them. This is what the Ordinals protocol does. It allows anyone to inscribe individual Sats with additional data and keep track of where they are. 

Ordinal Protocol and Inscriptions

As stated on the Ordinal website, a Sat inscription is an NFT; however, "digital artifact" is used instead because it's simple and familiar to artists, collectors, and traders. The phrase "digital artifact" is highly suggestive, even to someone who has never heard the term before. In comparison, NFT is an acronym that feels like financial terminology and doesn't indicate what it means if you haven't heard it before.

Bitcoin developer Casey Rodarmor created the Ordinal protocol in late January 2023. In an interview, Casey explained that he'd been considering making the protocol since he saw generative art NFTs on Ethereum in early 2022. Casey wanted to bring similar kinds of NFTs to Bitcoin. However, Casey stepped down as the lead developer of Ordinals in late May and announced a pseudonymous developer named Raph Japh would be taking his place as he couldn't give the protocol the attention it deserves.

Interestingly, Ordinals only need two things to run the protocol: a full Bitcoin node and a Bitcoin wallet that can read and write Ordinal inscriptions. Casey explained in an interview that the Ordinal protocol was designed to require no extra infrastructure; it exists entirely on Bitcoin. Even more interesting about Ordinals is that the inscriptions apparently can't be searched using a browser, at least for now. 

Casey explained that this is because of “instability.” This means that you must search for inscriptions manually on Ordinals.com, which isn't easy because there are many. For reference, there were more than 10 million inscriptions when Casey stepped down from the protocol in late May. It’s not surprising considering that multiple NFT marketplaces had started supporting Ordinals inscriptions, and a new type of inscription was also invented, the BRC-20 token. 

Image source: X [Twitter] Ordinals Wallet

What Is A BRC-20 Token?

The BRC-20 token experiment was introduced by a pseudonymous on-chain analyst named Domo in early March 2023; that enables users to create fungible tokens natively on Bitcoin. However, before launching BRC-20, Domo stressed that the token is “simply a fun experiment.” 

The BRC-20 token standard is similar to the ERC-20 token standard commonly used on the Ethereum blockchain. However, unlike the popular token standards on Ethereum, BRC-20 tokens do not use smart contracts. Instead, users store a script file on Bitcoin and use that to attribute tokens to individual satoshis. BRC-20s embed JSON data into ordinal inscriptions to enable users to deploy, mint, and transfer tokens. BRC-20s are considered “semi-fungible” since users can only exchange BRC-20 tokens in set increments. 
 
BRC-20 tokens have limited functionality compared to their ERC-20 counterparts on Ethereum. Unlike ERC-20s, which can be used as collateral in various dApps, BRC-20s are restricted to minting and moving fungible tokens on the Bitcoin blockchain. This is why there were over 10 million Ordinals but only around 40,000 BRC-20 tokens. Each Sat inscribed with an Ordinal Digital Artifact only contains one image, video, or text, whereas each Sat inscribed with a BRC-20 can have millions of units of a single token.

BRC-20 Memecoin Craze Causes Fees To Skyrocket

Naturally, BRC-20 tokens caused the number of inscriptions to surge, and the subsequent BRC-20 memecoin craze caused transaction fees on Bitcoin to spike. By May, the market cap of BRC-20 tokens had passed $1 billion, with crypto wallets adding support and exchanges listing the biggest ones. The most popular crypto wallet for BRC-20s and Ordinal Digital Artifacts is the UniSat browser extension. The browser wallet has been downloaded over 300,000 times so far. To put things into perspective, the wallet only had 100K downloads in mid-May – a 3X increase in a month.

Screenshot: Chrome Web Store

Meanwhile, the number of non-zero Bitcoin addresses, i.e., the number of Bitcoin wallets holding more than 0 BTC, has gone parabolic over the same period. Bitcoin miners have also been raking it in from the transaction fees. The fees actually surpassed the block rewards for the first time since 2017. At the same time, innovation around both Ordinals NFTs and BRC-20s had increased. 

More Innovations Ensued

One of the most famous innovations happened in February 2023, when a crafty hacker found a way to upload a cloned version of the 30-year-old video game classic DOOM to the Bitcoin blockchain as an inscription on the network’s Ordinal protocol. You can literally play a simplified version of Doom on Bitcoin. 

More recently, another pseudonymous Ordinal developer named Leonidas introduced recursive inscriptions, making it possible for inscriptions to interact. This, in turn, makes it possible to upload playable video games larger than one Bitcoin block and unlocks other new use cases. 

In May 2023, Milady’s NFT enthusiasts launched a new Ordinals NFT standard with the help of an Ordinal Digital Artifact marketplace that makes it possible to bridge NFTs from Ethereum to Bitcoin. The catch is that the conversion is currently a one-way trip, but it foreshadows more interoperability for Ordinal Digital Artifacts and BRC-20s. 

On that note, the first BRC-20 stablecoin was launched in late May. The caveat is that the issuer of this stablecoin appears to be somewhat sketchy. Even so, it foreshadows the launch of more reputable stablecoins directly on the Bitcoin blockchain, likely resulting in even more Bitcoin adoption. 

Image source: BRC-20.io

Bitcoin Maxis Pushing Back

Not everyone is applauding Bitcoin's recent innovation, however. Many have argued that Ordinals are useless. This argument has some merit, considering that some of the earliest Ordinal inscriptions contained unsavory types of content that have since been hidden. Still, as it’s been inscribed into the blockchain, the image itself is immutable.

Some have also argued that BRC-20 tokens are harmful. This is also understandable, considering that they caused transaction fees on the Bitcoin blockchain to spike. It’s made it more expensive for people in developing countries to send BTC transactions, all because some degens wanted to trade memecoins. 

Others have argued that Bitcoin shouldn't be used for anything other than regular peer-to-peer BTC transactions. This is reasonable, considering the Bitcoin white paper says peer-to-peer electronic cash. Never mind that the more complexity you add, the more vulnerabilities you create. 

Crypto analyst Eric Wall explained in an interview that the way the ordinals protocol was coded is akin to an exploit. Crypto VC partner Nick Carter also pointed out in an interview that this unforeseen use of the Taproot upgrade could make the Bitcoin community more hesitant to approve future upgrades. Nick believes that Bitcoin won't be seeing another upgrade for a long time because of the unforeseen risks it will create. 

On the other hand, many, including Nick, have argued that the objectively useless Ordinal Digital Artifacts will be priced out due to the increased transaction fees. It makes sense because whoever pays the highest price has their transaction processed first. People won't continue to pay a high price to inscribe useless data. 

Progressive Bitcoiners Counter

Some have argued that Layer 2s will solve the blockchain bloats supposedly caused by BRC-20s like the Lightning Network. This also makes sense because higher transaction fees on the base chain create an incentive to generate scaling solutions, an incentive lacking in Bitcoin. 

Others have argued that the fees from peer-to-peer BTC transactions alone may not be enough to secure the Bitcoin blockchain as time passes, so additional use cases should be allowed. This makes sense because Bitcoin isn't just a crypto; it's the most secure network in the world, the ideal base layer. It's not just the progressive Bitcoiners saying this, either. Bitcoin OGs like Blockstream CEO Adam Back have acknowledged that Bitcoin can be used for whatever people want. 

Many Ordinal supporters have also noted the technology’s contribution to the freedom of speech. One Bitcoin observer posted on X stating, “I know everyone hates Ordinals, but whether it’s text or images, the ability to publish uncensorable information on the Bitcoin time chain effectively makes speech uncensorable worldwide forever.” 

What matters at the end of the day is the demand for block space and BTC, ideally from objectively valuable use cases. F2Pool CMO Li Qingfei underscored that Ordinals and BRC-20 tokens will eventually give rise to these objectively valuable use cases once all the hype is gone. The consensus is that both innovations are a net benefit and clear advantage to Bitcoin, but it's still too soon to say what's hype and what's here to stay. 

Ethereum Gearing Up for Competition

Many people have pointed out that conversations around Ordinal Digital Artifacts and BRC-20 tokens sound eerily similar to those around the first NFT craze and the ICO boom on Ethereum in 2017. At the time, people were also arguing about Ethereum’s future in light of these disruptive innovations. Some of you will recall how pictures of cartoon cats once caused massive congestion, jamming up the Ethereum network.

You may also know that most crypto projects launched on Ethereum were utterly worthless. Notably, all will appreciate that many of the NFTs and ERC-20s that survived are valuable and useful. Chances are that we will see the same thing happen with Ordinal Digital Artifacts and BRC-20 tokens. This means that Bitcoin could become more akin to Ethereum; if it does, it will make BTC a more direct competitor to ETH, and it appears that ETH has already been gearing up for this direct competition. 

To explain, BTC is considered to be digital gold. This is primarily because BTC's tokenomics make it an ideal hedge against currency debasement and, arguably, inflation – It is “Sound money.” Conversely, ETH is considered to be digital oil. This is primarily because ETH is the fuel that runs Ethereum, which hosts most dApps and tokens. The narrative around ETH started to change in mid-2021 with the EIP1559 upgrade. 

EIP1559 burns a portion of all transaction fees on Ethereum to refresh your memory. With enough activity, this makes ETH deflationary. Hence, the new narrative of ETH is “Ultrasound money.” Obviously, the term is meant to imply that ETH is a superior store of value to BTC due to its deflationary nature. 

Image source: X [Twitter] 

Ethereum’s transition from Proof-of-Work to Proof-of-Stake also made ETH more appealing to institutional investors because they can stake it to earn a yield, and we know institutions love earning yield. Regarding the environmental aspects of Proof-of-Work versus Proof-of-Stake, you should know that ESG-obsessed institutional investors aren't really concerned about the E part. They're worried about the G, the Governance, i.e., the control. Bitcoin can't be controlled, and ESG investors don't like that.

What Makes BTC More Appealing

Given that ETH can be deflationary and earn a yield via staking, it begs the question of what makes BTC more appealing than ETH to investors, particularly institutional investors. Many people have been asking this question lately, especially as ETH continues to change and BTC stays relatively static. The answer to the question is “security.” 

The Bitcoin blockchain is the most secure network in the world, mainly because it is static compared with all the others, which change constantly. It is the ideal base layer on which additional innovations can be built. The only thing missing was the incentives to create them. Ordinal Digital Artifacts and BRC-20s have introduced these incentives and prepared Bitcoin’s ecosystem to see the same explosive growth Ethereum did after NFTs and ERC-20s saw genuine adoption. 

The difference is that Bitcoin’s ecosystem will be much more secure due to its base layer. This is significant because security is the only thing institutional investors love more than token burns and yield. They want to be sure that the tokens they mint on a cryptocurrency blockchain will stay there forever, and Bitcoin arguably provides more certainty than Ethereum here. 

This is for many reasons, including that Proof-of-Work is more secure than Proof-of-Stake. The infrastructure used to interact with Ordinal Digital Artifacts and BRC-20 tokens exists on Bitcoin itself—the fact that Bitcoin doesn't change, and it's been around for much longer than Ethereum. Never mind that BTC is the only crypto the SEC has said is not a security. 

Bitcoin Innovation Risks

As bullish as Ordinal Digital Artifacts, BRC-20 tokens, and other Bitcoin innovations will be for BTC, there will also be risks. This is one undeniable advantage that Ethereum has: it has moved fast, broken things, and fixed them. Bitcoin hasn't broken anything yet, but unlike Ethereum, it can't afford to. 

Many argue that the most significant risks associated with Bitcoin innovation appear to be regulatory. Bitcoin evangelist Michael Saylor believes there could be regulatory risks, mainly for BRC-20 tokens. Like the ERC-20 tokens on Ethereum, Michael thinks that some BRC-20 tokens could be classified as securities by the SEC. It's ironic, considering that BTC itself is supposedly immune from scrutiny. 

Definitively, the most considerable risk associated with innovation on Bitcoin is one that's been overlooked, and that's centralization. As transaction fees on the Bitcoin blockchain rise because of the innovation, more people, mainly those who don't have much money, will switch to using Layer 2 protocols. 

The Lightning Network is Bitcoin’s Layer 2 solution for its renowned slow transaction speed. It consists of payment channels that contain large amounts of BTC. Individual payment channels between various parties combine to form a network of Lightning Network nodes that can route transactions among themselves. The interconnections between different payment channels result in the Lightning Network. 

Unless you have enough BTC and technical know-how to open your own payment channel, you must use a payment channel that a third party of some kind operates. The harsh reality is that sending BTC transactions on the lightning network using a payment channel run by a third party is no different from using a bank to send fiat transactions. 

That's because every BTC transaction is tracked, and you technically don't own your BTC, meaning it can be frozen or stolen. Because of this protocol’s current vulnerabilities, third parties must run on nodes to prevent fraud within the Lightning Network, called a watchtower, which monitors transactions.

Today's gas fees on Ethereum transactions are unaffordable for most people, forcing them to use Layer 2s, which are centralized and controlled by VC investors. It’s fair to say that's not what crypto is about and what anyone wants for Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other cryptocurrencies. All being well, Bitcoin will take a different approach to growing and scaling its ecosystem than other Layer 1s. All it takes is the right incentives. 

Image source: Ordinals Marketplace

In Closing

The developers of the Ordinal theory have expressed that the most essential thing the Bitcoin network does is decentralize money. They acknowledge all other use cases are secondary, including Ordinals. However, they believe that Ordinal theory helps Bitcoin's primary mission, at least in a small way. 

Suppose inscriptions prove to be highly sought-after digital artifacts with a rich history. In that case, they will serve as a powerful hook for Bitcoin adoption: Come for the fun, rich art, and stay for the decentralized digital money.

Ordinals and inscriptions increase demand for Bitcoin block space, which increases Bitcoin's security budget. This is vital for safeguarding Bitcoin's transition to a fee-dependent security model, as the block subsidy is halved into insignificance and ensures that Bitcoin remains secure.

Many hope that the Ordinal theory strengthens and enriches Bitcoin and gives it another dimension of appeal and functionality, enabling it to serve its primary use case more effectively as humanity's decentralized store of value.

This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Markethive’s Reason For Being and Magnanimity. Entrepreneur One: A Divine Legacy

Markethive’s epic entrepreneurial ecosystem has come a long way since its Divinely inspired inception. Markethive now runs on its own servers, with the security of blockchain and its Hivecoin (HVC) so close to being released on crypto exchanges and self-custody wallets. We have arrived as the first mega-decentralized marketing and broadcasting network encompassed by a social media interface with a vision and mission to deliver an autonomous sovereign meritocracy en masse that is not subject to oppressive technocracy.

When the founder and CEO Thomas Prendergast was given this vision from the Lord to build Markethive, the basics had to be free for everyone, such as the newsfeed, video, autoresponders, capture pages, the rotator link, broadcasts, etc. All Tom had to do was work out how to fund the project. 

How was Markethive’s growth made possible?

Through the Divine inspiration and tenacity of the founders, the concept of the Entrepreneur One Loyalty Program (E1) was created.  When the Entrepreneur One Upgrade was constructed, it was designed to reward the person for seeing the vision and trusting Markethive, particularly Tom, to build this vision. 

Ergo, how the E1 works and what it does is a Divine inspiration. Firstly, it funds Markethive to build the vision, and in turn, it will give a magnificent return from the Initial Loan Protocol (ILP) or, as it’s more recently called, the Incentivized Loan Program, which is included in the E1. As the name suggests, it is a loan from you to the company that pays you back at the end of the term and gives you magnificent returns when Markethive opens it to the masses.  

Markethive did have numerous affluent investors preparing to invest millions of dollars into Markethive; however, various tragic events fell on each of them before finalizing their commitment. In Tom’s words, “…it’s so weird! It got to a point it was laughable.” 

But, Markethive does have a core of people who are dedicated to the Markethive vision and have given Markethive its “daily bread” by being an Entrepreneur One for $100 per month so Markethive can continue the Divine quest inspired by our Lord. It can only be explained as biblical. Because of the goodwill and conviction of some, Markethive has accumulated the money needed to move forward with development as fast as possible, funds permitting.

The world’s disastrous events, especially over the past three years, have been called biblical also, and this is the reason why the entrepreneurs of Markethive and the company have this imperative to free and help every living soul achieve financial and self-sovereignty. To be enlightened and awakened to the perils and evil that’s been active and, for the most part, hiding in plain sight for decades, if not centuries, from all of us. 

Markethive’s Engineers. A Divine Intervention

Markethive’s engineers came to Markethive through the Holy Spirit. They were told to work with Markethive through their relationship with the Lord, where they received messages and answers through inspiration. Markethive was the company they were directed to, and through their dedication, sacrifice, and ingenuity, the platform, with its unique concepts, is being built. We are so blessed to have them on board with us at markethive. 

Entrepreneur One Receives Many Rewards

The E1 wasn’t set up to be any particular time period, but as Tom & Co continues to build Markethive, the E1 has evolved and given those with one or more E1 accounts a variety of rewards. As explained in a previous article, there are many different rewards and opportunities to generate income allocated to the E1 member.  

The Banner Impressions Exchange (BIX) is one that has been overlooked up to this point. Since its release, it hasn’t been a huge moneymaker, but it will be. Keep in mind that the banners are only shared by a maximum of 500 E1 accounts. To explain its potential, let’s take LinkedIn as an example. 

LinkedIn has 750 million active users, which equates to 40 billion hits per day. When Markethive has those massive hits from 75 million users, and you’re one of only 500 E1 members that can sell your impressions to a potential 750 million people who want to run ads, they will be willing to pay $4-$5 per impression. The amount of income that alone can produce is significant. The revenue of just that one component of the E1 will increase over time, and it’s forever as long as you are an E1 and active.

The banner placement space that belongs to the E1s is showcased on the premium real estate of the Markethive site, which is the upper header space below the taskbar. The Banner Impressions Exchange is available to all members should they wish to buy impressions from the E1 members to place a banner in Markethive.      

The E1 Upgrade gives other excellent benefits, like a 100% matching bonus on your new signups and those brought in by the company. In other words, the E1s get all of the traffic Markethive is responsible for bringing in via marketing campaigns, and the signups are rotated to only the E1s. 

Another benefit is the upcoming Promocode issued by Markethive to the E1s. Each E1 member will have their own Promocode, and Markethive’s administrative control panel decides what products the Promocode gives. These incentives consist of WOF, Boosts, Markethive Credits, Markethive tokens, Push, Broadcast, HVC, etc. And these will be assigned in multiples! 

So when prospects sign up on your Markethive promocode site, they will receive what’s allocated once they’ve completed KYC. Furthermore, it’s free to you as an E1: Markethive includes this in the E1 Upgrade subscription.  

As Markethive builds its system, the daily bread has been coming in consistently via the Entrepreneur One Program, which has enabled Tom and the Engineers to produce the Premium Upgrade. The Premium Upgrade is one of the additional things they’ve added since Tom was told to give the platform away for free. 

Markethive’s Retail Products

We now have numerous facets added on top of the basics that Markethive can sell that are very valuable. Markethive now can create retail sales packages like the Premium Upgrade. We also have the Wheel of Fortune, the Boost, and the E1 banners and impressions.

In the works, we have the Push, which is a group that, when you publish in the group, your posts are on the top of every single newsfeed in view for every new person who signs up. The very top banner on the Markethive platform will also be available for sale, which is the ultimate in prime real estate and primarily for the company’s use.  We are also preparing to deliver the broadcasting, press releases, and video advertising. All of the above are Markethive’s retail products. 

More About The ILP

As stated earlier, The ILP is one aspect of the Entrepreneur One Loyalty Program but is separate. There is still some confusion about the difference between the E1 and ILP. To clarify, The E1 (Entrepreneur One Upgrade) is a $100 monthly subscription, where you earn 0.1 ILP after one year of consecutive payments, which accumulates every year while active. 

The ILP (Incentived Loan Program) is a loan to the company that is paid back to you via a balloon payment after 20 years, or you can re-initialize it for another 20 years. So, you are lending Markethive the money that the ILP represents. It also provides monthly payments or returns to you, which is 20% of the net revenue of Markethive’s retail products. This is paid to all ILP token holders per their pro-rata share as long as the principal is outstanding. 

Also, note that the ILP is an assumable note that you can transfer to anybody. For example, If you hand your Markethive account over to someone else, the ILP is theirs, and they benefit from the returns. There will be an ILP Exchange, like the upcoming E1 Exchange, where you can sell your ILPs. 

The Markethive legacy will last forever. Markethive’s ethos, ethics, and transparency allow everyone to benefit, including the BOD and Alpha shareholders from the previous company before Markethive. These members are grandfathered in, automatically receiving 0.5 ILP for BODs and 0.2 ILP for Alpha members. 

Right now, anyone can buy an ILP or part thereof with Markethive tokens, Bitcoin, bank transfers, or credit cards. You can also earn ILPs through the Entrepreneur One Program or win an ILP through the contests Tom holds occasionally. 

Remember, the ILP is not an ICO, which is a security. You are not buying it from Markethive on speculation that it will be worth more in the future, like stocks. The ILP is a loan, which is not a security but a legally binding and conforming loan agreement. Because it is a debt instrument, it is not subject to tax and is compliant with the USA UCC code governing debt instruments.

What Markethive, the company, pays out to you, in fact, all transactions, will come through the wallet Markethive has just finished building. The spectacular, very sophisticated wallet also keeps track of the ILPs you own, and you will be paid your 20% share of Markethive’s revenue with the profit of the retail products through your Markethive wallet. 

It’s important to note that the ILPs earned through the E1 Upgrade are bona fide and are yours to keep forever. Your earned ILPs will continue to pay you returns even if you cancel your E1 subscription. The ILPs will continue accumulating in the E1 Upgrade until all 1000 shares/ILPs are accounted for. 

Another Divine Inspiration from Tom

Here’s something to look forward to. Once the bona fide ILPs are dispersed, there will be what is called a Virtual ILP. (V-ILP) It will be produced to take its place and take another 10% of Markethive’s revenue. You will acquire the Virtual ILP in the E1 account that you have, and as long as it’s active, the Virtual ILP that it’s earning will pay out 10%. If you cancel the E1 subscription or sell it on the E1 Exchange, the V-ILP associated with that account will cease and no longer be payable to you. Unlike the original E1 Upgrade, you do not keep your ILP.

The E1 Is A Legacy Program

The Entrepreneur One Loyalty Program is a legacy program, and it’s Divine because not only does it empower Markethive to move forward, grow the company, and, as we move forward, be massively successful, but in turn, it pays back to each person who supported the company to fulfill its mission victoriously. Eventually, it will get to a juncture where there will be a tipping point, and more revenue will come into that ILP than what the E1s are paying out for their monthly subscription. 

Current Entrepreneur One members are urged to continue with their subscription as it will fuel their future wealth. Remember, it’s a loan from you that is paid back to you at the end. Meanwhile, 20% of Markethive’s revenue is also paid to you. This is unique and a gift from the Lord; no other company does this!  

The Markethive wallet has been accomplished and is functional for all intents and purposes. The wallet is just waiting for the Hivecoin launch to step outside of Markethive’s door, unleashing it to the global community. We are now very close to assigning Hivecoin and launching it to various wallets and exchanges.

The countdown will be activated at that time, and the announcement that the Entrepreneur One Loyalty Program is closing to new members and will not be available from the company, only E1 members through the E1 Exchange. You will have 30 days from the notification to either become an Entrepreneur One member or, if you have suspended your E1 Status, re-instate your E1 account to receive all the benefits and potential wealth it has to offer. 

But why wait? Become an Entrepreneur One now by subscribing for $100/month or save $200 when you purchase an E1 for $1000 for 12 months. Start accumulating your bona fide ILPs now. You’ll be an integral part of Markethive’s development envisioned for all humanity and be rewarded with a legacy of wealth to enjoy and pass on to your family.  

May the Lord bless and uphold you for all eternity…

About The Markethive Wallet – What You Need To Know

Great news, Markethivers! The wallet is now installed on the Markethive platform. Markethive has kept its promise and delivered a complete working wallet. This mighty, robust, and secure wallet encompasses all aspects of facilitating your business and securing all your financials within Markethive, like earnings and payments, dividends paid from your ILPs, retail products, etc. 

This is a significant step in the right direction for monetizing Markethive’s ecosystem as it endeavors to ensure and restore sovereignty and financial freedom increasingly being stripped from us by a global authoritarian regime. This article will illustrate what you need to know and do to access the now-operational wallet. 

Understand that access and functions of the wallet are only for Entrepreneur One (E1) members at this stage. E1 members can now retrieve their Hivecoin (HVC) from their cold storage to their hot wallet. (You can do this in preparation for the forthcoming coin exchanges and your 3rd party self-custody wallet.) You can also transfer HVC to other members within Markethive via the wallet. 

Access The Markethive Wallet

To access your wallet, tap on the wallet icon on your Markethive dashboard (portrayed in the image above). A popup of the wallet will appear on your screen. If you haven’t completed your KYC, you will see a stop sign (pictured below) and a prompt for you to initiate the KYC protocol. You must complete the KYC process and 2FA for access to the Wallets section of the Markethive Wallet. (Note: The 2FA protocol will be installed into the Security section of the wallet in due course.) Meanwhile, you will have confirmed your 2FA when logging in to Markethive. 

The non-E1 KYC-approved members will see the banner announcement (pictured below) until its full release. The image in the wallet has a link should you wish to upgrade to Entrepreneur One to gain early access and take advantage of all the benefits offered, including becoming a shareholder by securing the ILP (Incentivized Loan Program), which will pay a monthly dividend on the net profit of Markethive’s revenue. The E1 membership will no longer be available from the company once the wallet has fully launched. 

About KYC And 2FA

In Markethive’s case, KYC is for the community’s benefit of knowing who they are engaging with and not for governmental regulations, unlike exchanges and others.  It assures Markethive members that you are a real person, dedicated to honest and transparent relationships in business and socially. The purpose is to have an active, dynamic, and secure “hive of people.” Note that once KYC is approved, the documents uploaded to attain approval are all deleted; Markethive does not keep these documents. 

The short selfie video required in the Markethive KYC protocol is kept on file so you can retrieve access to your account if you lose it. The admin can verify you with that video if you lose your device and the 2FA app needed to utilize your Markethive account and wallet. You just make a short video requesting access to your account and how you lost access. The video prerequisite is another layer of security to prevent your account from getting hacked. It also prevents members who have signed up but are not verified from hacking or spoofing.   

This article comprehensively explains the 2FA installation and protocol for various devices. Since Markethive introduced 2FA at login, most members have successfully activated it; however, some still need clarification or have issues with it. The most common problem people have with the Google Authenticator app is an incorrect code. If your code is incorrect, it usually means you entered it after it expired. The code changes every 30 seconds. 

If you input your code within the allotted time and it’s still incorrect, it means the time on your Android device is not synced with your local time zone. To remedy this, open the Google Authenticator app on your Android device. In the top right, select More ⋮ > Time correction for codes > Sync now. On the next screen, the app confirms the time is synced.

Markethive Wallet Security

More and more platforms are utilizing this protocol for security reasons. Markethive has taken it further with its unique, never-been-done-before system to provide the most extreme security that virtually makes it impenetrable. Unlike other platforms, we have a comprehensive financial accounting hub that can be likened to a bank. Your assets in your wallet are precious and, in most cases, can be considered a livelihood.  

You must set up the Markethive security protocol as it is needed to transfer HVC to any other 3rd party wallet once HVC has been officially named and can be listed on various self-custody wallets. More about Hivecoin in a forthcoming article. This security consists of the following: 

1. Your Security word. 
2. Your security image and word.
3. Confirm your 2FA.
4. Retrieve the code sent to your email on record with Markethive.

The security of such a system needs to be severe and is very necessary in today’s world of massive corruption.

How To Retrieve Your HVC From Cold Storage

The above Markethive security protocol is unnecessary for internal transfers. However, as Markethive is currently on the Solana blockchain, you must have a small amount of Solana coin (SOL) in your Markethive wallet to facilitate the transfers, whether within your Markethive wallet or externally. As shown in the image below, only a minuscule amount of SOL (0.002) is needed to retrieve your HVC from cold storage to your hot wallet balance.  

First, to deposit SOL into your Markethive wallet, go to your Markethive Wallets section > Go to Solana Wallet > In the drop-down menu, tap ‘Receive Solana’ > Copy your Solana address. Then, go to the wallet where you hold the Solana coin and complete the transaction. Your chosen amount of SOL will be in your Markethive wallet instantly. 

You can then retrieve your Hivecoin from cold storage into your hot wallet to access your HVC for transactions. Once in the hot wallet, you can transfer to anyone within Markethive, or any wallet you or anyone else has where the HVC is listed.  

HVC Retrieval Guidelines

Another great reason to have Entrepreneur One status is that E1s have no limit on retrieving Hivecoin from the cold storage to the hot wallet. This drastically reduces the risks of bottlenecks that can occur when restrictions are in place. These guidelines are as follows: 

• E1s have limitless retrieval of Hivecoin from cold storage to the hot wallet.
• Premium upgrades can retrieve 10 HVC per day. 
• Free members can retrieve 0.01 HVC per day. 

Become an E1 Now. Time Is Running Out!

Markethive has built a system that works for the average entrepreneur and will continue to expand and reach new heights with its unique concepts and products. The wallet is now complete and functional for the Entrepreneur One members. You will want to become an E1 when you understand what Markethive is doing with the Entrepreneur One Upgrade. 

It’s Markethive’s vision and mission to spread the wealth with as many who are willing to be part of this. You bless Markethive by upgrading to Entrepreneur One now and be prepared to be blessed a thousandfold. This is your company, your online business, and your home. These memberships will be sought after, demanding huge prices on the upcoming E1 Exchange, and sold by E1 members who understand and believe in the vision with the foresight to acquire multiple E1 accounts. 

Entrepreneur One Upgrade. A Reciprocal Blessing. It Works Both Ways!

Secure your share of Markethive and experience exponential growth of your income and legacy. You are welcome to purchase multiple Entrepreneur One subscriptions, which multiplies your income accordingly. Time is running out as the E1’s availability from the company will soon come to a close when the Markethive Wallet is released to the community. This is your chance to secure an E1 membership from Markethive for free, help pioneer, and own part of the world’s first blockchain-driven social market broadcasting network of the future, where we stand for freedom and hold dear your sovereignty. 

Wall Street's Money Game Puts Crypto Revolution At Risk

Many people who believe in the potential of cryptocurrencies hope that Wall Street, the famous financial hub, will eagerly invest in the growing crypto market and enjoy the same profitable returns that individual traders have experienced whenever the value of cryptocurrencies has surged. However, this belief overlooks two crucial facts: firstly, Wall Street is already heavily involved in the cryptocurrency market, and secondly, it has no intention of injecting its capital to boost this volatile market.

The world of institutional finance has had numerous opportunities to capitalize on the cryptocurrency space. However, as its influence expands, the cryptocurrency market is transforming, potentially into something entirely different. Whether this transformation is intentional or an unintended consequence of its shortcomings, Wall Street may gradually undermine the essence of cryptocurrency itself.

This article explores the intricate dynamics between Wall Street and the crypto world, shedding light on the potential implications of the Wall Street money game in the crypto industry. Let's unravel the mysteries and better understand this ever-evolving landscape.

Wall Street Is Not On Your Side

The recent exposure of Wall Street's Bitcoin conspiracy has shed light on some alarming developments in the market. It all began with the BlackRock Bitcoin ETF application. BlackRock, a powerful asset manager known for its extensive control over various industries, including media and pharmaceuticals, has been implicated in bribery and political manipulation over the years. It is essential to remember that Wall Street and these major players are not interested in your financial freedom. They are anti-revolutionary and do not have your best interests at heart.

The news of BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF application is significant due to its massive influence as a $9.1 Trillion asset manager. Even a tiny portion of their funds could potentially buy up all the Bitcoin available on exchanges. However, BlackRock is not the only organization venturing into the Bitcoin ETF business. Fidelity, a $4.24 Trillion asset manager, and other major players are also interested in entering the market. These ETFs are expected to be backed by real Bitcoin and traded on stock exchanges.

The paperization of Bitcoin raises concerns as it will move more Bitcoin into the hands of stockbrokers, reducing the amount of Bitcoin available on the blockchain and resulting in fewer fees for miners in the long run. Long-term investors currently hold a significant portion of Bitcoin. BlackRock, Fidelity, Wisdom Tree, and Invesco, have all filed for Bitcoin ETF applications. These developments cannot be ignored.

Furthermore, we have EdX, an institutional-grade cryptocurrency exchange backed by Fidelity, Charles Schwab, and Ken Griffin's Citadel Securities. The pieces start to come together when we see the bigger picture. A crackdown on the cryptocurrency industry led by Gary Gensler, the head of the SEC, raises eyebrows. Gensler's previous affiliation with Goldman Sachs, a major player on Wall Street, suggests a conflict of interest. It appears that Wall Street is orchestrating a deliberate attack on its major competitors, such as Coinbase and Binance, while simultaneously preparing to launch its own cryptocurrency exchange.

The entry of Wall Street into Bitcoin is not a coincidence. It is a meticulously planned move to manipulate the markets for their benefit. Institutions like JPMorgan and BlackRock are experts in market manipulation, and their involvement in Bitcoin will undoubtedly affect its price. 

However, we must understand that inviting Wall Street into the cryptocurrency space comes with risks. They have a history of dismissing Bitcoin as a scam, and suddenly they are interested in Bitcoin. The agenda is clear; they aim to gain control over it and take surveillance to the next level. We can expect them to push for code changes in Bitcoin to exercise control, which organizations like Greenpeace have already discussed.

While the influx of ETF applications may seem exciting for regular consumers wanting to invest in Bitcoin, it comes at the cost of relinquishing the uniqueness of Bitcoin itself. Owning Bitcoin through Wall Street-backed ETFs means giving up control over your assets. The hope that these institutions will hold and redeem your Bitcoin in the future is not the vision that attracted many people to Bitcoin in the first place. If you genuinely believe in the principles of Bitcoin, buying and holding your own Bitcoin is crucial, securely stored in your personal wallet. Wall Street cannot be trusted with your financial sovereignty.

Image source: Wall Street Mojo

How Wall Street Can Potentially Harm Cryptocurrency

To understand how Wall Street can negatively impact cryptocurrency, let's delve into a concept called hypothecation. In simpler terms, hypothecation occurs when a company or firm pledges its equity shares as collateral to a lender. Here's an example to illustrate this: Imagine Company A needs $5 million, and Broker B agrees to lend them the money. In return, Company A offers $5 million worth of their securities as collateral to Broker B. This type of arrangement is known as hypothecation.

Now, here's where the potential problem arises. Rehypothecation comes into play when Broker B, the lender, reuses the assets received from Company A as collateral for their business activities. This practice allows Broker B to utilize the assets as a security for their transactions. In the traditional financial world, rehypothecation is relatively straightforward due to a few reasons.

Firstly, shares in the traditional financial system are not physically settled; ownership certificates represent them. This characteristic makes transferring ownership as an 'IOU' simple without physically moving the shares. Secondly, accounting and tax regulations permit the same asset to be attributed to different parties as long as each party records a distinct amount of debt on their balance sheets. However, this flexibility granted to banks and brokers increases the risk associated with counterparties involved in such a system.

Cryptocurrency, like Bitcoin and Ethereum, operates on decentralized networks that rely on blockchain technology. These digital currencies are not governed by centralized authorities like banks or governments. The underlying technology ensures transparency and trust in transactions by recording them on a shared, immutable ledger.

However, when Wall Street, with its established practices and financial mechanisms, enters the realm of cryptocurrency, it introduces potential threats. The concept of hypothecation and rehypothecation, which are prevalent in traditional finance, can pose risks to the stability and integrity of cryptocurrency.

One significant concern is the possibility of multiple parties claiming ownership of the same digital asset. Unlike traditional shares represented by certificates, cryptocurrency ownership is recorded and verified through complex cryptographic algorithms. If a broker were to hypothecate or rehypothecate digital assets without proper mechanisms in place, it could result in conflicting claims and disputes over ownership.

Moreover, the transparency and decentralization that define cryptocurrency could be compromised. Rehypothecation often involves leveraging assets for additional borrowing, which can introduce systemic risk and potentially lead to market manipulation. This practice could undermine the principles of fairness and equal opportunity that many proponents of cryptocurrency value.

The risk of counterparty failure increases with rehypothecation. In the traditional financial system, where banks and brokers hypothecate, and rehypothecate assets, the complexity of transactions and the interdependency among market participants heighten the risk of a domino effect if one party defaults. Such failures can have far-reaching consequences, including financial instability and loss of investor confidence.

The Implication Of Rehypothecation For The Crypto Industry 

There's an important issue to consider when discussing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. Many of these digital currencies claim to have a system that ensures their security and reliability, such as a proof-of-work (PoW) or proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism. However, these cryptocurrencies are often traded on centralized exchanges despite these claims.

Let's delve deeper into the problem. Imagine a scenario where a Bitcoin is rehypothecated multiple times as brokers and exchanges trade debt and collateral. In such a situation, who gets to claim ownership if there's a need for it? Who indeed possesses the cryptocurrency at the end of the day when multiple parties know the private key, or worse when no one does?

Cryptocurrency enthusiasts strongly believe in the idea that if you don't have control over your private key, you don't have control over your crypto assets. This means that if you don't directly manage and secure your private key, you can't truly claim ownership of your cryptocurrency.

Now, let's consider some potential problems that can arise. What if a broker goes bankrupt, and someone needs to be compensated? Or what if a hard fork happens, and someone needs to participate by voting with their stake in the cryptocurrency? In such cases, determining the rightful owner of the Bitcoin becomes exceptionally complicated due to the long chain of transactions involved. It becomes unclear who should be considered the valid owner, and this uncertainty creates a significant challenge.

Moreover, the current transient ownership model, where cryptocurrency ownership changes hands frequently, simply doesn't work well for assets recorded on a ledger. This flawed model can lead to multiple parties expecting compensation simultaneously, creating a chaotic situation. The risk of a complete breakdown in this scenario is alarming and could have devastating consequences.

One empirical example of the catastrophic consequence of rehypothecation in the crypto industry was the lucrative Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (GBTC) “premium arbitrage,” which led to the demise of 3AC, Genesis, and Grayscale. Rehypothecation generated credit from assets and allowed multiple transactions to be collateralized by the same asset. This unstable chain of transactions supported by the same collateral was poorly understood and resulted in the collapse.

Image source: Hackernoon

Addressing these concerns and finding solutions to ensure the proper ownership and control of cryptocurrencies is crucial. The complex and convoluted nature of ownership in the current system poses significant risks that could undermine the stability and reliability of cryptocurrencies as a whole. Therefore, exploring alternative models and frameworks that can provide a more robust and secure ownership structure for digital assets is essential. By doing so, we can build a stronger foundation for the future of cryptocurrencies and protect investors from potential disasters.

Why Investors Are Eager For A Bitcoin ETF

The idea of a Bitcoin ETF has captured the imagination of cryptocurrency enthusiasts for a couple of important reasons. First, ETFs are built on a solid foundation of tangible assets, and second, they are seamlessly integrated into the traditional financial market through brokers. If a Bitcoin ETF were to become a reality, it would make Bitcoin much more accessible to everyday investors who may not have the patience or technical know-how to buy Bitcoin on cryptocurrency exchanges or manage a blockchain wallet. In simple terms, a Bitcoin ETF could be the key to achieving widespread adoption of Bitcoin.

The hope for a Bitcoin ETF received a glimmer of optimism in October 2021 with the launch of the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). However, it's important to note that this particular ETF is not directly tied to Bitcoin itself. Instead, it tracks the Bitcoin futures contracts offered by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which are essentially bets on the future price of Bitcoin.

On the other hand, ETF proposals directly linked to Bitcoin from various companies have either been outrightly rejected, as was the case with early Bitcoin investors Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss or are still awaiting approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Although there are opportunities for profit in the cryptocurrency market, and the industry has experienced a surge in popularity in recent years, there remain numerous uncertainties surrounding the future relationship between cryptocurrency and Wall Street and its broader acceptance among the investing public.

Many investors believe that the influx of Wall Street money might lead to more regulation, oversight, and accountability in the crypto space, which could ultimately benefit users and investors.

In the end, the impact of Wall Street money on cryptocurrencies will depend on how regulators, policymakers, investors, and users find the right balance between risk and reward, trust and verification, centralization and decentralization, and innovation and stability.

Crazy Battle between Securities and Commodity Hangs Crypto in a Regulatory Limbo 

Welcome to the fascinating world of cryptocurrencies, where digital assets have emerged as a disruptive force within the financial ecosystem. However, navigating the regulatory landscape surrounding these innovative forms of currency can be a bewildering experience. Despite their name, regulatory bodies like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) do not recognize cryptocurrencies as currencies. Instead, they are often categorized as property, which has significant implications for taxation.

Simultaneously, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has raised concerns about initial coin offerings (ICOs) and their potential classification as securities. This has led to discussions around registration requirements and investor protections in the realm of cryptocurrencies. As a result, the emergence of cryptocurrencies has not only challenged traditional definitions and classifications of commodity and currency but has also blurred the lines between traditional financial instruments and these new digital assets.

Whether you are an investor looking to navigate the legal complexities of the crypto space or simply curious about the evolving nature of digital assets, this article aims to unravel the intricacies of the crypto landscape and shed light on how cryptocurrencies fit into existing regulatory frameworks. By exploring the classifications of cryptocurrencies as securities and commodities, we hope to provide you with a deeper understanding of their implications and the broader impact on the financial world.

Understanding Traditional Assets

To navigate the complex world of assets, it is essential to grasp the classifications established by regulatory agencies like the IRS, CFTC, and SEC for tax and regulatory purposes. While some definitions rely on legal precedents, such as the renowned Howey Test for securities, others may vary across regulatory bodies. Nonetheless, gaining a fundamental understanding of traditional assets is crucial before delving into the cryptocurrency spectrum.

There are three primary categories into which financial assets are typically grouped:

1. Real Estate:
Real estate, as a category of traditional assets, encompasses the land and any structures or improvements attached to it. This includes residential homes, commercial buildings, factories, warehouses, and even natural resources like minerals or water rights associated with the land. Real estate encompasses the tangible, physical properties and resources tied to a specific location.

When purchasing real property, certain fees and additional expenses contribute to the overall cost basis of the property. Specific rules and deductions apply to your taxes when dealing with real estate. By understanding the intricacies of real estate, including the costs involved in property transactions and the tax implications of property ownership, individuals can make informed decisions when buying, selling, or investing in real estate assets.

2. Securities:
Securities are financial instruments that represent ownership or a stake in a company or entity. They include familiar assets like stocks, bonds, and derivatives. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the regulatory body overseeing securities in the United States. To shed some light on the legal aspect, in a significant court case called SEC v W. J. Howey Co. in 1946, U.S. securities law defined securities as "investment contracts."

In simple terms, when someone invests in a security, they expect to profit solely from the efforts of the issuer or a third party involved. These profits can come from selling the security at a higher price, receiving dividends, or earning interest. This landmark case established the "Howey test." It was utilized in various SEC enforcement cases, including disputes involving tokens like Ripple's XRP and the creators of NBA Top Shot, a digital marketplace for sports collectibles known as non-fungible tokens (NFTs).

3. Commodities:
Commodities refer to physical goods traded in large quantities on specialized exchanges. They can include agricultural products like corn and wheat and precious metals like gold and silver. Their current market price typically determines the value of commodities. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) oversees certain aspects of commodities trading in the United States.

However, it's important to note that the CFTC's regulatory authority primarily covers wrongdoing related to commodities futures trading rather than spot trading, which involves immediate transactions of physical goods. Spot trading of commodities doesn't fall under the CFTC's direct jurisdiction like securities do under the SEC.

As the popularity of crypto assets continues to soar, questions arise regarding how these conventional asset categories apply to the growing realm of digital assets.

Cryptocurrencies challenge the traditional notions of physical-focused assets, prompting regulators to adapt their frameworks and policies to encompass these innovative financial instruments. Consequently, exploring the distinct characteristics and implications of digital assets within the context of existing asset classifications becomes imperative.

Image source: Crypto.news

Why the Classification of Cryptocurrencies Matters

To truly grasp the different categories that crypto-assets fall into and how it impacts their regulation, it's essential to understand the meaning behind the Howey Test. The Howey Test has emerged as a widely respected method to classify these assets, and it does so by posing these fundamental questions:

1. Is money being invested?
2. Is there an expectation of earning a profit from the investment?
3. Does the investment involve a common enterprise?
4. Are profits generated through the efforts of others?

If a cryptocurrency meets all four criteria outlined in the Howey Test, it is considered a security. This means that promoters are actively marketing these tokens, while investors anticipate earning profits primarily through the efforts of others. SEC Chair Gary Gensler emphasized this point in a statement on September 8, emphasizing the prevalence of token sales where the public expects profits based on the actions of others. By understanding these criteria, individuals can gain insights into how crypto-assets are classified and regulated under the Howey Test.

If a cryptocurrency is classified as a security, it means that the issuers and exchanges of that cryptocurrency must obtain licenses from securities regulators. However, getting these licenses can be pretty challenging, which is why the crypto industry puts a lot of effort into ensuring that their cryptocurrency sales and projects comply with securities laws.

Issuers try to avoid violating securities regulations by focusing on decentralization. If a cryptocurrency is developed in a way that doesn't have a central group driving up its value, it becomes less likely to be seen as security by regulators. This is why decentralized finance (DeFi) projects work towards decentralizing their development efforts and splitting governance through decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs). 

They also utilize mechanisms like proof-of-stake as a consensus mechanism. The argument behind this approach is that if people are both investors and actively participate in the project's growth, such as by staking the coin or voting in DAO decisions, they are no longer solely reliant on a third party to generate returns, as required by the Howey test.

The risk of classifying cryptocurrencies as securities is that exchanges may choose not to list them to avoid being fined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for trading unregistered securities. Cryptocurrencies may face state-specific rules and regulations. For instance, the New York Attorney General filed a lawsuit against KuCoin, and multiple state regulators have teamed up to target a coin featuring Elon Musk's image called TruthGPT Coin. These cases highlight the potential legal complications that can arise.

The SEC has provided guidance on initial coin offerings (ICOs) and digital assets. In their framework for the investment contract analysis of digital assets, the SEC emphasized factors such as the speculative nature of many ICOs and their lack of utility as payment or store of value, which could lead to these coins being classified as securities. Kik, an ICO project, faced legal consequences when its CEO said buying its tokens would result in significant profits. The SEC sued Kik, and the company was fined $5 million, nearly pushing them to bankruptcy.

Conversely, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) argues that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether are commodities and can be regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). The CFTC's rationale is based on the fact that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin are interchangeable on exchanges, just like sacks of corn of the same grade have the same value. This determination was reinforced in the CFTC's case against Bitfinex, a crypto exchange, and Tether, a stablecoin issuer, where the agency stated that digital assets like Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, and Tether are all commodities.

Determining whether cryptocurrencies fall under the classification of securities or commodities has significant implications for their regulation. It affects licensing requirements, listing on exchanges, compliance with securities laws, and potential legal consequences. These classifications shape the regulatory landscape and play a vital role in how cryptocurrencies are treated within the financial ecosystem.

Image credit: Markethive.com

Where Things Stand in The Ongoing Regulatory Debate

The regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies is constantly evolving, and it's challenging to predict how it will look in the future. Various stakeholders and factors are involved, making it a complex situation. In the United States, Congress has made efforts to grant the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) broader authority to regulate the spot trading of non-securities tokens. Among these tokens, Bitcoin is currently the only one that both agencies, the CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), openly agree on its classification.

One possible outcome of this ongoing debate is that specific cryptocurrencies may be classified as securities while others are treated as commodities. This would create an even more intricate regulatory landscape where different cryptocurrencies are subject to different rules and regulations.

Alternatively, lawmakers could establish crypto as its distinct asset class, introducing tailored regulations specifically for cryptocurrencies. This approach is largely followed by the European Union, which has implemented the Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation. MiCA outlines steps that crypto issuers, wallet providers, and exchanges must follow to protect consumers and ensure fair trading.

However, even with these regulations in place, there may still be some legal areas that need to be addressed on a case-by-case basis. For example, determining whether a particular series of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) must adhere to specific rules. As the discussions continue and regulatory bodies navigate the complexities of cryptocurrencies, it remains a dynamic and evolving landscape with ongoing developments that will shape the future of crypto regulation.

Controversial Guidelines on How Cryptocurrencies Are Classified

The classification of cryptocurrencies has been a contentious issue, with different U.S. regulatory agencies offering their own definitions. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) labeled cryptocurrencies as securities, considering them investment assets that generate returns. This categorization was based on federal security laws and the belief that anything traded on an exchange qualifies as a security, including cryptocurrencies.

However, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took a different approach. Following a court ruling.pdf, the CFTC gained the authority to regulate digital currencies as commodities, treating them similarly to products like coffee and oil.

Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) defined cryptocurrencies as taxable property for federal tax purposes, adding another layer to the classification debate.

Two other agencies, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), also provided their guidelines. OFAC considered digital currency on par with fiat currency, while FinCEN categorized cryptocurrencies as a form of money. These distinctions diverged from other agencies' commodities, property, or asset classifications.

These conflicting definitions within the same government highlight the challenge businesses face in legally classifying cryptocurrencies. However, efforts have been made to bring more clarity. For example, the SEC clarified that it does not consider Ethereum and Bitcoin securities but focuses on Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs). While there is an ongoing debate, this statement narrows the understanding of cryptocurrencies within the United States.

The different classifications can create confusion for businesses, which may struggle to understand which regulations apply to them. This confusion can lead to legal risks if companies fail to comply with the appropriate regulations. It can also discourage some businesses from entering the cryptocurrency market due to the uncertainty and complexity of regulations.

Moreover, the classification can impact innovation in the crypto industry. If a new cryptocurrency is classified as a security, it may deter innovation due to the stringent regulatory requirements. Conversely, if classified as a commodity, it may encourage development due to the relatively less strict regulations.

However, it's important to remember that the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies is still evolving, and changes may occur in the future that could affect crypto businesses. Therefore, it's crucial for companies to stay updated on the latest regulatory developments and seek legal advice to ensure compliance.

Classifying cryptocurrencies as securities or commodities is complex, with significant implications for investors and regulators. As the cryptocurrency market continues to evolve, it may be necessary to reevaluate and refine these classifications to reflect this asset class's unique nature accurately.

While the current classifications provide some clarity, they also highlight the need for a more nuanced regulatory framework to accommodate cryptocurrencies' distinctive characteristics. This is a challenge that regulators worldwide will need to address in the years to come.

This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

UPDATE: Phase Three of the Markethive Wallet. Completed Version Now Installed On Markethive. What’s Next?

Since Phase Two of the wallet has been integrated and working successfully since November, it’s time to introduce Phase Three. The completed wallet has been installed on the Markethive site. Phase Three is the final stage of the wallet that is now operational for Entrepreneur One (E1) members in a type of Beta version, if you like, before it officially opens to the Markethive community. 

This is a culmination of 5 years of intense early work to reach this point, and we are on that cusp. E1s can currently view the new look of the wallet, particularly the Hivecoin Report. Markethive’s engineers are now systematizing the other fundamental components needed for a synchronous and successful wallet launch. These are the Entrepreneur One Exchange, Markethive Premium Upgrade, and the PROMOCODE system, housed in the new capture page for MARKETHIVE.NET and is for E1s only. 

The non-E1 KYC-approved members will see the banner announcement pictured below until its full release. They also have the opportunity to upgrade to Entrepreneur One to gain early access and take advantage of all the benefits offered, including becoming a shareholder by securing the ILP (Incentivized Loan Program), which will pay a monthly dividend on the net profit of Markethive’s revenue. 

Google Authentication – 2FA Is Moving

One specific adjustment that Markethive will apply is the 2FA. Instead of it being required to log in to Markethive, the 2FA will be moved to the wallet. KYC Application has also been relocated to the Security section of the wallet. Soon, you will find 2FA with the KYC Application and Wallet Security housed under the Security Tab listed in the wallet. 

Until you activate 2FA Google Authenticator, access to the different wallet functions will be restricted. Many exchanges operate similarly. However, Markethive is more than an exchange, so Markethive’s commitment to getting the KYC, ILP, and the complete back-end security totally polished is of the highest priority. 

Along with this change, new signups will be able to utilize the Markethive tools for a short time (30 days). In other words, give it a test drive. However, they won’t get the airdrop or qualify for the micropayments until they are KYC’d. They will be prompted to complete the KYC/2FA process immediately upon joining Markethive to activate these incentives and gain access to the Hivecoin wallet. Failing to do so will result in the termination of their account after 30 days. This process will eliminate abandoned accounts. 

On a related topic, another change is that old accounts that have not been logged into for an extended period will not be terminated. 

Markethive is delivering a bank, not an exchange per se. We are an ecosystem with Markethive Credits, ILPs, Markethive Tokens, or MHVs, used internally for micropayments and the Hivecoin (HVC) with a total supply of 45 million. All these components have value and are the DNA of Markethive, so its security is paramount. Markethive is also working on eliminating all 3rd parties that could disrupt the operations of Markethive. We have already relocated to our sovereign cloud systems and servers. 

Ultimately when the new dashboard is integrated, very little of Markethive’s systems will operate until you complete KYC and 2FA. It will be mandatory to carry out the KYC process and be approved to access the wallet. In the near future, only KYC-approved members will have access to all the services in Markethive, including free members. Until KYC is approved, free members can only observe and comment on the main news feed. 

It’s important to remember that in Markethive’s case, KYC is for the community’s benefit of knowing who they are engaging with and not for governmental regulations, unlike exchanges and others.  It assures Markethive members that you are a real person, dedicated to honest and transparent relationships in business and socially. The purpose is to have an active, dynamic, and secure “hive of people.” Note that once KYC is approved, the documents uploaded to attain approval are all deleted; Markethive does not keep these documents. 

The short selfie video required in the Markethive KYC protocol is kept for the purpose of retrieving access to your account. In the event that you lose your device and the 2FA app required to utilize your Markethive wallet or any other service that requires KYC, the admin will be able to verify you with the video they have. All you’ll need to do is make a video requesting access to your account with the reason why you lost access. 

The video prerequisite is another layer of security to prevent your account from getting hacked. It also prevents members who have signed up but are not verified from hacking or spoofing.   

Coin Storage and Reports

The wallet has two coin storage balances: the Hot Wallet Balance and the Cold Storage Balance. The cold storage part of the wallet is a very secure one-way system. It requires a tremendous amount of authentication to retrieve coins from the cold storage balance and transfer them to your hot storage balance.  

Members who are KYC-approved but have yet to upgrade to either the Premium Upgrade (coming soon) or the Entrepreneur One (currently available) will have a limited withdrawal amount of 0.01 HVC from their cold storage per day. There will be no limit to sending HVC from your Hot Wallet to your chosen self-custody wallet. (Exodus, Phantom, Atomic, etc.) 

The amount of HVC that can be transferred from cold storage to the hot wallet will be unlimited for the E1s. Markethive recommends that once you’ve moved your coins from cold storage to your hot wallet, you move them into your personal 3rd party wallet. E.g., Exodus, Phantom, Atomic, et al., or whatever you determine what wallet is best for you. 

Hivecoin (HVC) is a Solana token but has not officially had the name assigned yet. E1s with early access who want to give the system a test run will need to acquire a specific type of wallet, set up the Hivecoin Meta address, and give it the name HIVECOIN to list it in that wallet. 

HIVECOIN's META address is: APRXuct2fy7yXeSPcS5r4pTdh6P34xhqj1Pio1dyc1j6

There is a Beta group of E1s currently testing it. However, there has been some difficulty in achieving this for some, at this time, including myself; however, you can try it. The Phantom wallet is recommended for Beta until we reach the threshold of having HVC officially named and available to list on various self-custody wallets.  To learn more about self-custody wallets, go here. 

Please be aware that this takes time, but once it’s done, it’s set in stone if you like, so it has to be incredibly secure and compliant. It needs to be streamlined before the floodgates open. 

Projects In The Works

Several projects are now in the works and will be timed to release at the end of the 30-day Wallet launch announcement. 

Markethive.net Website and Promocode

One of the components and fundamentals required before the wallet’s final release is the Markethive.net Promocode website. The comprehensive website includes navigational links to white papers on many aspects of Markethive and is exclusive to the Entrepreneur One Status.  

The white papers listed include the Role of Community, Markethive Broadcasting, Business Liability, Inbound Marketing, The ILP,  and the Traffic Report. The E1 members will be given promocodes for an incentive with an offer of the Markethive products, such as The Boost or Wheel of Fortune, impressions, and tokens.

The countdown ticker on the website homepage will align with the official launch of the wallet and be the focus of a marketing campaign prior to the release. 

The Premium Upgrade

The Premium Upgrade is another component on the table to be released at the end of the 30-day countdown to the final launch of the wallet. It is aimed at free members who want to take advantage of the many features and benefits that will accelerate their earnings and results. The upgrade has five price levels starting at $9.95 per month. You can find out more about the Premium Upgrade here. 

Notably, the revenue generated from the Premium Upgrade initiative is primarily income, meaning the ILP holders can look forward to the dividends of their ILP shares.

The Entrepreneur One Exchange 

Another project in the works is the E1 Exchange. (E1X) Upon the final launch of the wallet, the Entrepreneur One Upgrade will not be available for any new or free members from the Markethive administration. However, they can be acquired through our E1X. Here are the preliminary specifications for sellers and buyers. 

Seller Specifications

• The seller must have an active Entrepreneur One or more than one to sell.
• The seller can only list E1 accounts singularly. Cannot sell E1s in batches of 2 or more.
• The seller sets a reserve price. If the reserve price is met by bid or offer, the E1 sells.
• When an E1 account sells, it automatically transfers to the buyer.
• When an E1 transfers, it does not include the already earned ILPs or coins.
• When an E1 sells, it does carry the earned months toward the ILP yearly award.
• The seller decides what currency is accepted.
• The currency the seller can set is Markethive Credits, Hivecoin, Bitcoin, and Solana.
• Listed E1s for sale reveal the earned months towards the ILP yearly reward.
• The seller decides to run an auction, buy it now, or both.
• The seller decides to set a "reserve" or “Buy It Now” price or no reserve open offer.
• Auction bids run for seven days.
• Buy it now runs for ten days.

Buyer Specifications

• The buyer must be KYC approved.
• The buyer can bid against others bidding in an auction.
• The buyer can make an offer if the auction has no previous bids.
• If the offer meets the reserve or exceeds, the sale occurs.
• All sales are final.

Site Specifics

• New sale offers list at the top. Most recent first, oldest last.
• Listing can be sorted with the lowest price
• Listing can be sorted with the highest price

As the Markethive community, we must understand that Markethive’s services, vault loads, accounting, security, and privacy, are all found in the wallet. So Thomas has made a draft video for the new up-to-date wallet. 

WALLET ORIENTATION DRAFT 01

What’s Next?

• The "new" News Feed
• Our own Web Conference Rooms
• The "new" PageMaker
• The "new" Dash Board

Markethive’s Proactive Innovation (AI)

On another crucial topic, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become more prominent and prolific recently, with many unwittingly enamored by the concept. However, the reality is, it’s a double-edged sword for humanity that could bring about significant positives and disastrous consequences. The risk of bad actors using it to create chaos, increase the spread of propaganda and untruth, and even seize all computing and weapons systems is very real and extremely dangerous. The threat of AI taking on a life of itself is staggering.  

CEO of Markethive, Thomas Prendergast, expressed that you will not see artificial intelligence at Markethive! In a very heartfelt message, he explained that it is ungodly, threatens your well-being, and seriously violates your privacy and security!

What will you find?

Proactive Innovation.

“Think of it as advanced robotic systems, very complex and sophisticated capabilities controlled by you. Or a limited (AI secured) within the confines of our programming and only developed to produce the results of a well-oiled social network of entrepreneurs who gain and affect the entire Hive. (like our coming NEW newsfeed). 

You will be able to configure and control your algorithm. Your search criteria and activity will never be captured nor sold by us at Markethive. Because you alone control it, and it is yours alone, secured and protected here at the Hive.

This is the message I received in the last few months from prayer, the innovative intuition that has been and will always be the engine at Markethive. Our artificial intelligence is Jesus Christ. Our artificial intelligence environment is the members of Markethive as a community embracing the spiritual solution to the false god of artificial intelligence.  

Hive technology uses the Hive community to shape our technologies to embrace our environment, chart our course and perceptions, and solve our problems with the singular goal of serving the Lord.”

In closing

There will be notifications and floating banners (above) to provide ample awareness of when the 30-day countdown for the official launch of the wallet will commence. That will be your last chance to secure lifetime residual returns with the Entrepreneur One Upgrade with ILP shares. 

All updates and orchestrations are discussed at the Markethive meetings every Sunday at 10 am Mountain Time. (MST)  You can keep yourself up to date with the latest news and developments of Markethive as they happen. To access the meeting room, go to the Markethive Calendar and click on the link provided.

We are so blessed to be part of Markethive as it stands tall and robust, providing a sanctuary for all entrepreneurs in such a dark world. Light will prevail, and Markethive will thrive and prosper to uplift and free every living soul into a life of whole-hearted humanity and abundance on every level. Exciting times are just around the corner. Praise the Lord, our Divine Architect. The fruits of the harvest with the best of humane technology will be at Markethive. You wouldn’t want to be anywhere else! 

Also published @ BeforeIt’sNews.com; Steemit.com; Substack.com

U.S. Crypto Upheaval Leads to Surprising Boon for Lucky Regions

The U.S. crypto space is in chaos. In recent years, the world has witnessed a rough journey for cryptocurrencies, with their popularity surging to unprecedented heights. However, once a hotbed of crypto innovation, the United States now grapples with a clear regulatory framework. It has become hostile that necessitates a crypto exodus in the country. As the U.S. SEC hostility becomes too much to bear, which other jurisdictions are poised to attract entrepreneurs, builders, and innovators in the FinTech and crypto space?

While causing concerns within the country, this crypto fiasco has inadvertently paved the way for other regions to emerge as potential beneficiaries of the evolving crypto landscape. In this article, we will explore the regions poised to experience Crypto Bliss in the wake of the U.S. crypto fiasco.

Europe's proactive regulations, Asia's crypto-friendly environment, and the global nature of decentralized finance collectively shape a new era of innovation and adoption. As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, these regions will likely play a pivotal role in shaping the future of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, opening doors to a world of new possibilities.

Implications of Strict U.S. Crypto Regulations

The implications of U.S. crypto regulations are far-reaching and complex. On the one hand, regulation can provide clarity and legitimacy to an industry plagued by Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD). On the other hand, regulation can stifle innovation and limit access to new technologies.

One of the most significant implications of U.S. crypto regulations is that they have created a patchwork of laws that vary widely from state to state. This makes it difficult for companies dealing in cryptocurrency to operate across state lines. For example, New York has implemented BitLicense, which requires companies dealing in cryptocurrency to obtain a license from the state.

Alabama requires a license for selling or issuing payment instruments, stored value, or receiving money or monetary value for transmission. Arizona, Arkansas, and Connecticut have no specific cryptocurrency laws but have issued guidance on the subject. California and Colorado have a licensing requirement for businesses that engage in virtual currency activities. 

The lack of uniformity in regulations hampers the growth and development of the crypto industry, as companies must navigate a maze of compliance requirements and legal frameworks. This adds complexity and costs to their operations and creates uncertainty for investors and consumers.

Moreover, U.S. crypto regulations directly impact the global crypto market. The United States is one of the largest cryptocurrency markets, and any regulatory changes or restrictions can have ripple effects worldwide. For instance, when the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) took a stringent stance on initial coin offerings (ICOs) and classified specific tokens as securities, it sent shockwaves through the industry and influenced regulatory decisions in other countries.

Another implication of U.S. crypto regulations is their effect on investor protection. While regulations aim to safeguard investors from scams and fraudulent activities, they can also restrict access to certain investment opportunities. For example, the SEC has imposed strict accreditation requirements for investing in certain crypto assets, which can exclude retail investors from participating in potentially lucrative ventures.

Furthermore, U.S. crypto regulations impact financial institutions and traditional banking systems. As cryptocurrencies gain mainstream acceptance, banks and financial institutions are increasingly exploring ways to integrate crypto-related services into their offerings. However, the regulatory landscape can be a significant barrier for traditional institutions looking to enter crypto. Complex compliance requirements, potential legal liabilities, and the risk of non-compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) regulations pose challenges for banks, inhibiting their ability to embrace cryptocurrencies fully.

The U.S. crypto regulations' impact on the broader economy should not be overlooked. The crypto industry has the potential to drive economic growth, create jobs, and foster technological innovation. However, overly burdensome regulations can hinder these positive outcomes. By balancing regulation and fostering innovation, policymakers can create an environment that encourages responsible growth and positions the U.S. as a global leader in the crypto space. Still, unfortunately, the reverse is the case.

Uncertainty in the Crypto Space

It is quite notable that even before the emergence of Operation Chokepoint 2.0.pdf, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had not approved any Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). This lack of approval is significant, considering ETFs are key players in market liquidity.

Instead of approving such ETFs, regulators have chosen to drain liquidity. Crypto-friendly banks like Silvergate and Signature were the first to face repercussions. However, the circumstances surrounding their fall were viewed with suspicion, leading lawyers from Cooper & Kirk to suggest that it reflected regulatory overreach targeting the crypto industry.

Throughout 2023, the SEC has been taking aggressive action. The regulatory watchdog has filed complaints against Bittrex, Kraken, Gemini, and Paxos. Binance.US and Coinbase have also been targeted in a culmination of these actions. 

By charging Coinbase as an unregistered securities exchange, the SEC has opened up a wave of legal uncertainty. It is worth noting that the SEC had previously approved Coinbase's underlying business model, a prerequisite for the company to go public under the ticker COIN in April 2021. However, as Coinbase expanded its range of crypto offerings, the SEC now views some of them as "crypto asset securities."

Simultaneously, the SEC needed to provide clear guidance when previously requested, which appears to be a deliberate strategy to establish rules through enforcement in the absence of proper legislation. While Coinbase is taking the SEC to court to seek clarification on securities, the damage has already been done.

In response to the legal uncertainty, Robinhood has announced that it will delist major cryptocurrencies like Cardano (ADA), Solana (SOL), and Polygon (MATIC) on June 27, with the possibility of more delistings based on the SEC's interpretation. Binance.US has halted all USD deposits, and Crypto.com is closing its institutional exchange.

As a result of this legal uncertainty, there has been a significant outflow of liquidity, leading to a $55 billion shrinkage in the total cryptocurrency market cap. Given the increasing fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) in the U.S. crypto space, it raises the question of which crypto-friendly regions will most benefit from this situation.

European Union (EU)

Despite officially entering a recession, the Eurozone is the first major region to establish a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets. Eurostat data reveals that the Eurozone accounts for approximately 14% of global trade, putting it alongside China and the U.S. as the top three players in the market.

The E.U.'s Market in Crypto-Asset (MiCA) regulations are set to come into effect between June and December 2024. This regulatory clarity has prompted Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse to identify Europe as a "significant beneficiary of the confusion that has existed in the U.S." in a recent CNBC interview.

Similarly, Paul Grewal, Coinbase's chief legal officer, views the U.S. crackdown on cryptocurrencies as an "incredible opportunity" for Ireland and Europe, as stated in an interview with the Irish Independent. Years in the making, MiCA embodies a balanced and proactive approach to crypto regulation. It encourages innovation while considering financial stability and consumer protection. Here are some key highlights of the MiCA regulations:

• Digital assets are categorized across a spectrum, including e-money tokens (EMT), asset-referenced tokens (ART), crypto-assets, and utility tokens.

• Requirements vary based on market capitalization. For instance, smaller-cap and utility tokens are exempt from providing a whitepaper covering liability, technology, and marketing.

• However, suppose an ART (stablecoin) or EMT exceeds certain thresholds, such as a €5 billion market cap, 10 million holders, or 2.5 million daily transactions with a volume exceeding €500 million. In that case, they are deemed "significant" gatekeepers and fall under the Digital Markets Act (DMA) regulation.

• All crypto companies are licensed as crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), with custodians and exchanges requiring a minimum liquidity threshold of €125,000 and trading platforms needing €150,000.

• CASPs must report user transactions to maintain licenses with the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA). This reporting includes transfers between CASPs and self-custodial wallets if the transactions exceed €1,000. CASPs must also record the senders and recipients for hosted wallets, following the "Travel Rule."

While the increased tracking may not be ideal, it represents a significant step towards legitimizing the crypto industry. In contrast, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler recently made blanket statements referring to crypto investors as "hucksters, fraudsters, scam artists."

It is also worth noting that Switzerland maintains its position as an innovation sandbox while interacting with the Eurozone. This is why many prominent crypto foundations, such as Tezos and Ethereum, are in Switzerland.

Within the E.U. itself, numerous crypto companies have gained global recognition. Notable examples include the Netherlands-based options trading platform Deribit, Finland's LocalBitcoins, Lithuania's DappRadar, and Ledger, a hardware wallet provider headquartered in France.

Switzerland

Switzerland, famous for its breathtaking landscapes and precision timepieces, is quickly establishing itself as a worldwide center for cryptocurrency businesses. What sets Switzerland apart is its regulatory environment, which plays a crucial role in fueling the growth of crypto enterprises. 

The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has taken proactive steps to establish clear guidelines for crypto companies, offering them the legal certainty they need to operate. A prime example of this progressive mindset is the "Crypto Valley" in Zug, where numerous blockchain and cryptocurrency startups have found a home.

In 2020, Switzerland solidified its reputation as a crypto-friendly nation by passing the Blockchain Act. This legislation provides a comprehensive legal framework for distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain, ensuring businesses clearly understand their legal obligations and rights.

Another key factor contributing to the success of crypto businesses in Switzerland is the country's robust financial infrastructure. With some of the world's largest banks and financial institutions, Switzerland offers crypto enterprises access to a sophisticated and mature financial ecosystem. This infrastructure, combined with Switzerland's stable economy, makes it an ideal location for businesses operating in the volatile realm of cryptocurrencies.

Switzerland's dedication to innovation and education is also vital in driving the growth of crypto businesses. Swiss universities rank among the world's leaders in blockchain research, consistently producing talented individuals for the rapidly expanding industry. Prominent institutions such as the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH Zurich) and the University of Zurich offer courses specifically focused on blockchain and cryptocurrency, equipping students with the necessary skills to propel the industry forward.

The future appears bright for crypto businesses in Switzerland. The country's forward-thinking regulatory environment, robust financial infrastructure, and commitment to innovation will continue to foster growth in the sector. Furthermore, the Swiss government's openness to new technologies and willingness to engage in dialogue with crypto businesses indicate that Switzerland will maintain its status as a global hub for cryptocurrency innovation.

Dubai

Dubai's government has been actively working to create a welcoming environment for crypto businesses. They understand the importance of regulation and have proposed a comprehensive framework through the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA). They aim to balance addressing concerns like money laundering and terrorist financing while encouraging innovation and healthy competition in the crypto industry.

The Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) has also taken steps to foster a crypto-friendly atmosphere. They introduced the Innovation Testing License initiative, allowing fintech firms to test their ideas in a controlled environment before launching them to the public. This approach promotes a safer and more secure environment for businesses and consumers.

Dubai's commitment to technological advancement and its Smart Dubai initiative further enhance its appeal to crypto businesses. They have recognized blockchain technology's potential and implemented it in various sectors, such as real estate, healthcare, and transportation. This integration of blockchain applications demonstrates their dedication to creating an innovative and progressive city.

Furthermore, Dubai's solid internet infrastructure, widespread mobile usage, and extensive data centers provide a strong foundation for crypto businesses to flourish. These resources are essential for the seamless operation of crypto-related activities and ensure businesses can operate efficiently and effectively.

Dubai's strategic location as a bridge between the East and the West adds to its allure as a global crypto hub. It has attracted significant crypto industry players, including renowned exchanges like Binance and blockchain startups like ConsenSys. These companies contribute to the local economy and foster Dubai's vibrant and dynamic crypto ecosystem.

Looking ahead, the future of crypto businesses in Dubai appears promising. The government's commitment to embracing blockchain technology, a favorable regulatory environment, and advanced infrastructure establish a strong foundation for sustained growth in the crypto sector. Moreover, Dubai's status as a global financial hub and its strategic location continue to attract international crypto businesses. As more companies establish their presence in Dubai, the city is on track to becoming a renowned global crypto destination.

Hong Kong

A semi-autonomous region of China has come back into the world of cryptocurrencies. Despite mainland China's ban on cryptocurrencies to ensure the smooth implementation of the digital yuan, Hong Kong has been given the green light for retail crypto trading since June 1.

However, certain restrictions exist for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in Hong Kong. They are required to block retail traders from mainland China, and the tokens they list must possess high liquidity, be included in two major indices, and have at least one year of trading history. VASPs must also adhere to various regulations, including segregating customer assets, setting exposure limits, following cybersecurity standards, and avoiding conflicts of interest.

The decentralized finance (DeFi) sector can also flourish in Hong Kong under the Securities and Futures Ordinance, specifically the Type 7 license, with their tokens classified as either futures or securities. As a result of the new regulatory framework, several exchanges, such as CoinEx, Huobi, OKX, Gate.io, and BitMEX, have hurried to obtain VASP licenses in Hong Kong.

Interestingly, Z.A. Bank, a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned company Greenland and the most prominent digital bank in Hong Kong, has also participated in Hong Kong's e-HKD Pilot Programme initiative. This demonstrates China's full endorsement of Hong Kong's adoption of digital assets for the foreseeable future.

Moreover, Hong Kong's tax regulations on businesses are quite favorable. While individual taxpayers are exempted from the capital gains tax, companies are subject to a single-tier tax system where corporations are taxed at 16.5% on assessable profits.

Singapore

Singapore, a highly developed city-state, has emerged as a major cryptocurrency hub in the Asia-Pacific region. One of the key reasons for this is the absence of capital gains tax, which means that individuals trading or selling cryptocurrencies are not burdened with tax liabilities.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) classifies cryptocurrencies as "intangible property" and allows their use as a medium of exchange for goods and services. This is facilitated by homegrown payment provider Alchemy Pay, making crypto transactions relatively easy in the country.

However, it's important to note that businesses in Singapore are subject to a flat corporate tax rate of 17%. Nonetheless, Singapore offers a three-year tax exemption for start-up firms, providing them with a favorable environment to establish themselves and build credit, especially when traditional funding opportunities are limited.

Singapore has attracted major cryptocurrency players thanks to its financial stability and favorable regulations. For example, OKCoin, Coinbase, Binance, and Crypto.com have all set up offices in Singapore. Crypto.com has obtained a Major Payment Institution (MPI) license from the MAS, freeing it from certain thresholds related to its Digital Payment Token (DPT) services. This strategic move safeguards the exchange's operations amidst the SEC's tough stance on similar platforms.

In addition to its crypto-friendly environment, Singapore has been proactive in integrating artificial intelligence (A.I.) and machine learning technologies. The Ministry of Education has already developed AI-powered student learning systems, demonstrating the country's commitment to leveraging game-changing technologies.

As A.I. continues to advance and intertwine with the crypto industry, Singapore is well-positioned to become a hotspot for innovative crypto projects. Singapore's favorable tax regime, supportive regulations, and embrace of transformative technologies like A.I. make it an attractive destination for the cryptocurrency industry, drawing major players and paving the way for future developments.

As the U.S. crypto fiasco unfolds, these favorable regions offer promising prospects for the crypto industry. These regions provide supportive regulatory frameworks, fair tax policies, and a commitment to embracing emerging technologies. By capitalizing on these opportunities, crypto enthusiasts, entrepreneurs, innovators, and businesses can find their version of Crypto Bliss in these forward-thinking destinations.

This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Crypto Regulations: The WEF “Want In” Recommending A Global Approach For The Crypto Industry 

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is notorious for having a far-reaching and perplexing influence over companies and institutions in many countries worldwide. This influence extends to the crypto industry and crypto regulations. The WEF published a crypto regulation white paper in May 2023, which is significant, so we’ll take a look at what they have to say and how it could influence the crypto legislation being proposed worldwide. We’ll also examine how it could affect the crypto market if implemented.

Image source: Weforum.com

The WEF white paper summarized in this article is titled “Pathways to the Regulation of Crypto-Assets: A Global Approach.” The white paper begins with a brief preface by a member of WEF’s Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. For context, WEF founder and chairman Klaus Schwab conjured up the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This concept involves replacing all of us so-called serfs with AI and Automation. Another component of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is controlling the population with technology. 

In the preface, the question is asked of how governments can control a borderless, open-source, and decentralized technology. Naturally, the only solution is a globally coordinated approach to regulation. The author of the preface reveals that the WEF has been engaging in “multi-stakeholder consultations” to understand how to roll out global crypto regulations. 

For reference, a stakeholder is a term the WEF uses to describe powerful individuals and institutions, not ordinary people like us. In this case, the author of the preface specifies that the white paper was put together with “significant contributions from members of the Digital Currency Governance Consortium.” (DCGC)

For those unfamiliar, the DCGC was formed in January 2020, including multiple crypto companies. The complete list of DCGC members is private. Still, research on the WEF reveals that Ripple, also the Ethereum company, Consensus, and USDC issuer Circle are all part of the DCGC, as are dozens of prolific personalities in the crypto industry. 

The DCGC has published five reports so far, and the WEF website notes that it is currently in phase two of its master plan, which involves assessing the economic effects of crypto, stablecoins, and central bank digital currencies. (CBDCs) 

The Key Takeaways

The next section of the white paper provides a summary of the key takeaways. Here, the authors argue that global crypto regulations are not only desirable but “necessary.” They seem to suggest this is because of the increasing connections between crypto and traditional finance. The authors explain that many things are standing in the way of global crypto regulations, including: 

• A lack of universally accepted definitions for different types of cryptos, 
• A lack of coordination between Regulatory Agencies 
• Regulatory Arbitrage, meaning some countries are too pro-crypto. 

The authors highlight that many unaccountable and unelected international organizations have been working on global crypto regulations. This includes the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Financial Action Task Force. (FATF) The authors admit that the WEF has been in contact with these organizations but insist that academia, civil society, and crypto users will also have a say in global crypto regulations. Of course, the authors don't put a timeline on when we will have a say in this matter; but we have yet to have a say in anything. 

Why Are Global Crypto Regulations Required?

The first part of the report is about why global crypto regulations are required. The authors start by explaining what crypto assets are and include stablecoins under the definition of a crypto asset. Note that these reports seldom refer to cryptos as currencies; they believe cryptos are not currencies. That said, the authors do acknowledge that cryptos have some financial use cases. They say that this is why regulatory scrutiny around crypto has increased. 

As you might have guessed, they refer to the crash of Terra last May and the crash of FTX last November as examples of why regulatory scrutiny is justified. The authors then explain that different jurisdictions have since introduced different crypto regulations. They claim that this increases the risk to the global financial system and benefits bad actors in the crypto industry. 

They also highlight the inconsistency in crypto definitions. The authors then suggest that smart contracts could be one way of ensuring regulatory compliance. This is not surprising considering that the WEF is a massive fan of programmability in payments. Again, the WEF and its affiliates ultimately want to control what people do, and programmable payments are one way to do just that.
 
When it comes to regulating cryptocurrencies, the authors say the first step is identifying where the crypto activity is taking place, if possible. The second step is to determine who is engaging in the crypto activity, and the authors say that privacy coins, personal wallets, and DeFi protocols make this problematic. This is a worry because it implies that personal wallets will be a target of global crypto regulations. 

Although, in fairness, the authors of this white paper don't seem to be that opposed to personal wallets. That's because they know that if you buy your crypto through an exchange with KYC, it's easy to identify which wallet belongs to who with the help of blockchain analytics companies like Chainalysis.  According to the authors, the third step to regulating crypto is determining who is responsible for any crypto activity. They admit this is sometimes difficult, mainly when dealing with decentralized protocols. They note that this will become easier if DAOs become regulated entities.

Crypto And Traditional Finance Connections

In the next section, the authors dig deeper into the connections between crypto and traditional finance. They start by saying that the crypto market’s correlation to BTC's price is a sign of maturity. Now this is arguably incorrect; a decoupling between different crypto categories would be a sign of maturity. What the authors do get right, however, is that institutional interest in crypto has been on the rise. 

Image source: Finoa

They cited a series of statistics from pro-crypto sources, which should be taken with a grain of salt. Genuine institutional interest and investment will come once crypto regulations are introduced everywhere. The authors also note that retail interest in crypto is on the rise and imply that this could cause problems for financial stability. This could explain why some countries, such as Canada, closely aligned with the WEF, have started introducing restrictions on retail investors in crypto. 

Besides contagion risks, the authors correctly underscore concentration risks as another concern. The crypto market relies on a handful of stablecoins, a handful of exchanges, and even a handful of cryptos. Oddly enough, the authors claim that Layer 2s on Ethereum lower this concentration risk. This is odd because many Layer 2s still rely on Ethereum for their security, which logically increases concentration risk, never mind that many of these Layer 2s are highly centralized and backed by the same investors. 

Challenges To Global Regulation 

The second part of the white paper is about the challenges to global crypto regulation. The authors start by reiterating that the absence of universally accepted crypto definitions is the biggest problem. They propose a potential taxonomy but admit that there are exceptions to every crypto definition. They then explain that this is a problem because it makes consensus about specific crypto regulations impossible. It increases the cost of crypto compliance worldwide, making it difficult to protect consumers. 

Image source: Weforum.com

According to the authors, regulatory arbitrage is the second challenge to global crypto regulation. They take issue with the fact that crypto developers can relocate wherever they want. It’s becoming all too clear that the WEF would like nothing more than to control the movement of people. 

On a related note, did you know that the WEF is also trying to turn almost every major city into a Smart City? More about that in an upcoming article. Meanwhile, Smart technology is already causing issues for consumers. 

The authors admit it might still be too soon to push for global crypto regulations. Most governments are still trying to wrap their heads around the technology. Some jurisdictions are further along than others, such as the EU, which recently passed its MiCA crypto regulations. 

The authors then reveal that these early crypto regulations, including MiCA, will come into force starting early next year. This is significant because this could make institutional investors comfortable allocating to crypto again. It means the crypto market could rally starting early next year. And this, coincidentally, corresponds with the next Bitcoin halving. 

The authors also take issue with so-called crypto hubs. They seem to imply that the crypto hub is code for ‘less crypto regulation’ and appear to blame them for causing regulatory arbitrage. If the WEF starts pulling the strings, this could be awkward for places like the UAE, Dubai, Hong Kong, and Singapore. 

Geopolitics

This ties into another vital angle the authors raised regarding crypto regulations – Geopolitics. International relations are deteriorating, making it difficult for certain countries to comply with global crypto regulation recommendations. It's safe to say that this trend will continue. 

The above relates to the third challenge to global crypto regulation: "Fragmented monitoring supervision and enforcement.” The authors reiterate that a lack of international cooperation is one of the core causes of this fragmentation, coupled with the rapid evolution of crypto-related technologies. 

The authors then provide the FATF's infamous travel rule as a case study. The travel rule requires all transactions above a certain threshold to be tracked and KYC’d. The authors complain about the fact that compliance with the FATF's travel rule has been slow when it comes to crypto. 

While we’re on that topic, you should know that the FATF has reportedly been pressuring countries to restrict or even permanently ban crypto to get off its grey list. Any country on this so-called naughty list is refused bailouts from the IMF, so a clean report from the FATF may be a political priority. If there is any truth to this, crypto hubs could face financial sanctions if they don't comply with the FATF’s crypto recommendations; perish the thought. 

Approaches To Regulating Crypto Globally

The third part of the white paper is about the possible approaches to regulating crypto on a global scale. The authors provide a de facto list of regulations the WEF wants to see. 

• Crypto-specific 
• Stablecoin-specific
• Know Your Customer (KYC) /Anti Money Laundering (AML) 
• Consumer protection, including restricting retail access to crypto 
• Strict regulations around crypto marketing 
• Regulation of DeFi and DAOs 

The authors then detail the five primary approaches to crypto regulation. 

1: The first is Principles-based regulation. This involves regulating around a series of broad principles rather than specific rules. The benefits of this approach are innovation and flexibility. The drawback is regulatory uncertainty. 

2: The second approach is Risk-based crypto regulation and involves applying the same risk/same regulation principle, meaning that crypto should abide by existing financial regulations. The benefit of this approach is regulatory certainty, and the drawback is difficulty in assessing risks. 

Notably, the WEF is a massive fan of this same risk/same regulation approach. It's why you see it in many existing regulatory recommendations for crypto. If that wasn't concerning enough, in this section, the WEF advocates for eliminating cash and going digital to ensure that KYC/AML is followed. 

3: The authors call Agile regulation the third approach to crypto regulation. This effectively allows regulations to evolve in response to new innovations. The benefit of this approach is that it is flexible. The drawback is that it requires much coordination and collaboration with the crypto industry. 

4: The fourth approach to crypto regulation is Self- and co-regulation. It involves allowing the crypto industry to set standards. The benefit of this approach is that it builds trust. The downside is that it can lead to capture; For instance, one company determines all the standards. 

5: The fifth approach to crypto regulation is one we’re all familiar with: Regulation by enforcement. It involves taking crypto companies and projects to court and using the precedent as de facto regulations. The benefit is accountability, and the drawback is zero innovation.

Interestingly, the authors asked their so-called stakeholders which regulatory approaches are best. The results can be seen in the image below. As one would expect, Risk-based regulation is the most popular, especially considering that the WEF is a fan of this particular approach. 

Image source: Weforum.com

The authors confirm that the other unaccountable and unelected organizations, such as the FSB and FATF, have been adhering to the WEF’s Risk-based approach to crypto regulation. It's preposterous to consider just how much influence the WEF has, and this is just the public stuff. 

WEF’s Recommendations for Global crypto regulations.

The fourth part of the report contains the WEF’s recommendations for Global crypto regulations. The authors explain that these recommendations are meant for international organizations, governments, and “industry stakeholders” who are presumably part of the WEF. 

In other words, these recommendations are what most crypto regulations will look like, regardless of what we, the people, say or do. The authors again claim that the average person will get the chance to give their input someday, but we’ll just have to wait and see if that happens. 

The first set of recommendations is specifically for international organizations. These are to;

• Create definitions for different types of cryptos and crypto activities 
• Set standards for how these cryptos and activities should be regulated
• Share data about registered entities with all organizations. 

It brings into question whether ‘registered entities’ include the average crypto user. As it’s the WEF, the answer is probably, yes. After all, the endgame of these international elites is to create a global government with a global digital ID and a global centrally controlled digital currency. 

The second set of recommendations is specifically for governments. These are to; 

• Coordinate regulations between jurisdictions.
• Create regulatory certainty for the crypto industry.
• *Use technology for regulation by design. 

*The latter means regulation at the blockchain level via Smart contracts. Remember, the WEF loves programmability. 

The third set of recommendations is specifically for the crypto industry. They are; 

• To set standards 
• To share best practices
• Ensure “Responsible Innovation.” 

This seems to be code for adhering to ESG criteria, given that the term refers to environmental, social, and economic risks. 

If you've been following articles about ESG, you'll know it's an investment ideology to ensure the UN's sustainable development goals or SDGs are met. Every country is supposed to meet the UN's SDGs by 2030. My research suggests that all the dystopian stuff being pushed has its roots in the United Nation's SDGs, be it CBDCs, digital IDs, smart cities, or online censorship. 

If you've been following articles about ESG, you'll know it's an investment ideology to ensure the UN's sustainable development goals or SDGs are met. Every country is supposed to meet the UN's SDGs by 2030. My research suggests that all the dystopian stuff being pushed has its roots in the United Nation's SDGs, be it CBDCs, digital IDs, smart cities, or online censorship. 

Image credit: Markethive.com

What Affect Will It Have On The Crypto Market? 

So the big question is, how could the WEF’s global crypto regulation recommendations affect the crypto market if implemented? The short answer is that it would result in the crypto industry being absorbed into the existing financial system, which is precisely what the WEF wants. 

The practical effect of Risk-based regulation is that crypto is forced to comply with existing financial regulations. As the authors tacitly admit, these risks posed by crypto aren't always clear. Many argue that the risks are significantly different and justify different regulations. The WEF’s recommendations would make crypto worse than the existing financial system. That's because they would require information about all registered entities to be; 

1. Shared with international organizations 
2. Require regulations to be enforced via Smart contracts
3. Require all cryptos to be ESG compliant 

These three unsuitable recommendations have one thing in common: Governance, more succinctly, control. This article about ESG and Bitcoin explains that the environmental aspect isn't the problem; it's the governance. Bitcoin can't be controlled because it has no traditional governance structure. In case you missed it, this is the core issue the WEF and its allies are trying to address. How do we control something that is designed not to be controlled? 

It's possible, if not likely, that the endgame of the environmental-focused attacks on Bitcoin is to track all Bitcoin miners and nodes. It’s something that the WEF’s global crypto regulations would prescribe because Bitcoin miners and nodes would presumably need to be registered. 

Their information would therefore have to be shared with all international organizations. At that point, it would become possible to control Bitcoin in theory. In practice, the WEF’s global crypto regulations will never come to pass, which the authors have also tacitly admitted. 

In addition to the geopolitical tensions, it's practically impossible to introduce the same crypto regulations in every single country simultaneously. This means that there's going to be some regulatory arbitrage, whether it's intentional or not. This regulatory arbitrage will exist for years, and in some countries, it will persist for decades. 

So long as there's a country out there that the WEF can't influence, it won't be able to entirely corrupt crypto. Also, because crypto innovation is essentially exponential, there's a high likelihood that it will evolve to the point that the WEF and its allies can’t control it. This is the most important takeaway – Crypto is too fast for the WEF. 

Klaus & Co will never be able to keep up, and crypto will eventually win the race. Right now, though, there are many hurdles facing the crypto industry, and the WEF’s white paper suggests that it played a role in putting those hurdles in place. The WEF's fingerprints are there, whether it's the FSB or the FATF. It’s also common knowledge that there are WEF allies in the crypto industry. 

Even so, many in the crypto industry who are on the right side of history, and we at Markethive, genuinely believe that the incentives of crypto are more robust than the WEF’s cronyism. Imagine helping to create a powerful crypto or protocol that allows the average person to preserve their purchasing power, grow their wealth, and maintain their financial freedom. In that case, you are rewarded in every possible way.  

As purchasing power, wealth, and financial freedom continue to erode, the incentive to create robust protocols with crypto will only increase. Eventually, the incentives will become so strong that the WEF’s hurdles will become irrelevant. The people will want freedom, and they will achieve it through crypto. 

This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

References: World Economic Forum, Coinbureau

The Great Disconnect: Exploring the Global De-banking of Crypto Businesses.

Cryptocurrencies emerged as a disruptive force, challenging the traditional financial system and centralized control. With their potential to revolutionize cross-border transactions, enhance financial inclusion, and provide secure and transparent transactions, cryptocurrencies gained momentum among investors, businesses, and individuals seeking alternative financial solutions. However, traditional financial institutions have not met this radical shift towards decentralized finance with open arms.

In recent years, a concerning trend known as de-banking has emerged, where banks and other financial institutions systematically sever ties with crypto-related businesses. This process entails closing accounts, denying services, and declining partnerships with companies involved in cryptocurrency-related activities. While financial institutions cite concerns over regulatory compliance, money laundering risks, and reputational damage, critics argue that de-banking stifles innovation and hampers the growth of the burgeoning crypto industry.

This article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the global de-banking phenomenon, shedding light on its underlying causes, consequences, and potential implications for the future of cryptocurrencies. By examining real-world examples from various countries and industries, we will delve into the factors contributing to this widespread debanking trend. Additionally, we will explore crypto-related businesses' legal and regulatory challenges, often prompting financial institutions to distance themselves from this sector.

Furthermore, this article will explore the immediate and long-term consequences of de-banking on the affected businesses and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem. We will delve into the difficulties crypto entrepreneurs encounter in accessing banking services, obtaining loans, and establishing partnerships, as well as the potential implications for financial stability and the overall adoption of cryptocurrencies. 

Image credit: Markethive.com

De-banking Phenomenon

De-banking refers to the systematic severance of ties between financial institutions and businesses whose operations are perceived not to be in line with legal and governmental regulations. This process involves banks closing accounts, denying services, and declining partnerships with companies engaged in such activities. While financial institutions often cite concerns over regulatory compliance, money laundering risks, and reputational damage as reasons for de-banking, critics argue that this approach stifles innovation and hampers the growth of the burgeoning crypto industry.

To truly understand the de-banking trend, we must explore the underlying causes. One of the primary factors is the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies. Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide have struggled to keep up with the rapid development of this new technology. The lack of clear and comprehensive regulations has created an uncertain environment for financial institutions, leading them to adopt a cautious approach.

The anonymity and pseudo-anonymity offered by some cryptocurrencies have raised concerns about potential money laundering and illicit activities. While the blockchain technology behind cryptocurrencies provides transparency, it can also be exploited by individuals seeking to conceal their identities and engage in unlawful practices. Although wary of potential legal and reputational risks, many financial institutions have chosen to distance themselves from the crypto industry.

The debanking phenomenon is not limited to a specific country or region; it is a global trend affecting businesses operating in the cryptocurrency space worldwide. For example, many crypto-related startups have struggled to establish banking relationships in the United States. Banks often view these businesses as high-risk due to regulatory uncertainties and the perceived association with illicit activities.

As a result, companies have faced difficulties accessing basic banking services, such as opening business accounts and obtaining loans. Europe has also witnessed a similar debanking trend. Several major European banks have halted services to crypto-related businesses or imposed severe restrictions, hindering their ability to operate smoothly. The situation in Asia is no different, with countries like Iraq imposing a de facto ban on cryptocurrencies and financial institutions wary of engaging with crypto-related entities.

Traditional lenders are reluctant to extend credit to companies operating in the cryptocurrency space due to perceived risks and uncertainties. Access to capital is needed to improve the growth and expansion of these businesses, limiting their potential for innovation and development. These entrepreneurs face significant challenges in accessing banking services, which are vital for day-to-day operations. Without a bank account, businesses struggle to receive and manage funds, pay employees, and transact with suppliers. This creates a substantial operational burden, forcing companies to rely on alternative and often less efficient solutions.

The impact of de-banking extends beyond individual businesses to the broader adoption of cryptocurrencies. The inability to establish partnerships with financial institutions inhibits the integration of cryptocurrencies into the mainstream financial system. It hinders the ability of consumers to use cryptocurrencies for everyday transactions, limiting their utility and slowing down the overall adoption process.

However, it is crucial to consider the perspectives of all stakeholders involved in the de-banking debate. Financial institutions are tasked with ensuring regulatory compliance and managing risks associated with the cryptocurrency industry. With increasing regulatory scrutiny, banks face immense pressure to prevent money laundering, fraud, and other illicit activities. By distancing themselves from crypto-related businesses, they aim to protect their reputation and avoid potential legal repercussions.

Regulators, however, grapple with the challenge of striking a balance between fostering innovation and safeguarding financial stability. Developing clear and effective regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies is a complex task that requires careful consideration of the unique characteristics of this digital asset class.

Crypto enthusiasts advocate for a more collaborative approach, where financial institutions work with the crypto industry to address concerns and find mutually beneficial solutions. This includes implementing robust know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) measures and enhancing transparency and cooperation between regulators and industry participants.

Moreover, de-banking crypto-related businesses can have significant implications for financial inclusion. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to provide financial services to individuals and companies that are underserved by the traditional financial system. For example, in many developing countries, traditional banking services are limited, and many individuals and businesses rely on mobile money services to manage their finances. 

Cryptocurrencies have the potential to provide an alternative to these services, offering faster, cheaper, and more secure transactions. However, the de-banking of crypto-related businesses can limit the ability of these individuals and companies to access these services, further limiting their financial inclusion.

The Impact of De-banking on the Crypto Industry

Lack of access to traditional banking services can create significant operational challenges for crypto-related businesses. Moreover, the lack of access to conventional banking services can also limit the ability of crypto-related businesses to establish partnerships with other companies and organizations. This can limit the potential for collaboration and innovation in the industry, further limiting the growth potential of cryptocurrencies.

The potential implications of these challenges for financial stability and the overall adoption of cryptocurrencies are significant. Without access to traditional banking services, crypto-related businesses may be forced to rely on alternative banking relationships or operate entirely outside the conventional financial system.

This can create significant risks for financial stability, as these businesses may be more vulnerable to fraud, money laundering, and other forms of financial crime. Without the ability to easily convert cryptocurrencies into fiat currency, many consumers and companies may hesitate to adopt these assets as a form of payment or investment.

There are several reasons why some banks and financial institutions decide to de-bank crypto businesses. Some of them are:

•  Regulatory uncertainty: Cryptocurrencies' legal status and regulation vary across jurisdictions and are often unclear or inconsistent. This challenges banks and financial institutions to comply with anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CTF), and other rules and regulations. Some banks and financial institutions may prefer to avoid dealing with crypto businesses altogether rather than risk facing fines, sanctions, or legal actions.

•  Compliance risks: Even if the regulation of cryptocurrencies is clear and consistent, banks and financial institutions still face compliance risks when dealing with crypto businesses. For example, they may have difficulty verifying their crypto customers' identity and source of funds or have to deal with complex and costly reporting requirements. Some banks and financial institutions may also be concerned about the reputation risk of being associated with crypto businesses involved in illicit activities or scams.

•  Volatility: Cryptocurrencies are known for their high price volatility, which can pose risks for banks and financial institutions that provide services to crypto businesses. For example, if a bank offers a loan to a crypto company that uses cryptocurrencies as collateral, the value of the collateral may fluctuate significantly and affect the repayment ability of the borrower. Similarly, suppose a bank provides a payment service to a crypto business that accepts cryptocurrencies as payment. In that case, the value of the payment may change drastically between the time of the transaction and settlement.

•  Competition: Cryptocurrencies are also seen as a potential threat to the traditional financial system, as they offer alternative ways of storing and transferring value that may challenge the dominance and profitability of banks and financial institutions. Some banks and financial institutions may view crypto businesses as competitors rather than customers or partners and seek to limit their growth or market share by debanking them.

Operation Chokepoint

Operation Chokepoint, introduced in 2013 by the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) under the Obama administration, primarily focused on combating fraud in high-risk industries by pressuring financial institutions to sever ties with specific businesses. The operation targeted sectors such as payday lending, firearms, ammunition sales, online gambling, and debt collection. The strategy involved pressure on banks and payment processors to cut off services to these industries, effectively choking off their access to the financial system.

The primary concern driving Operation Chokepoint 1.0 was to curtail fraudulent activities in industries that posed higher risks. The DOJ expressed concerns that some businesses in these sectors were engaged in deceptive practices, leading to consumer harm and financial losses. By leveraging its authority and coordinating with other regulatory agencies, the DOJ sought to disrupt the economic infrastructure supporting these industries and minimize their ability to carry out activities.

Screenshot: Twitter

The connection between Operation Chokepoint 1.0 and Operation Chokepoint 2.0 lies in extending the original concept to the crypto industry. Operation Chokepoint 2.0 indicates the application of similar tactics employed in the initial operation to the crypto industry. Just as Operation Chokepoint 1.0 sought to target high-risk sectors by pressuring financial institutions, Operation Chokepoint 2.0 involves exerting pressure on banks, payment processors, and other financial service providers to sever ties with cryptocurrency-related businesses. 

The victims of Operation Choke Point 1.0 are thus all too familiar with what the participants in the crypto economy are now experiencing. The campaign begins with a series of vague policy pronouncements and ominous warnings issued as informal guidance to the banks. Then there is a flurry of decisions by banks to terminate their banking relationships with the targeted industry, of accounts closed either without any explanation or with the decision being attributed to “compliance requirements,” to “your business being outside of our risk tolerances,” or to “risks associated with your business.” All these are gimmicks to destroy the crypto industry.

Examples of De-banking in the Crypto Industry

It has been a common practice for banks to distance themselves from companies they perceive as high-risk for many years. However, the de-banking of crypto-related businesses has become increasingly prevalent in recent years as the industry has grown and regulators have struggled to keep up with the pace of innovation.

Binance US is halting US dollar deposits and withdrawals from its platform as of June 13, 2023. This comes after the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Binance and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao, for allegedly violating securities laws and operating an unregistered exchange. The SEC also asked a federal court to freeze Binance US assets.

The de-banking of Binance US could be a concern for the crypto community because it could affect the liquidity and accessibility of the crypto market in the U.S. Binance US is one of the largest crypto exchanges in the country, with over 2 million users and more than $1 billion in daily trading volume. 

If Binance US users cannot deposit or withdraw fiat currency, they may have to resort to other platforms or methods that could be more costly, risky, or inconvenient. Moreover, the SEC's crackdown on Binance could signal a more aggressive and hostile stance towards the crypto industry, which could discourage innovation, investment, and adoption of digital assets.

On May 18th, 2023, Binance Australia announced that it had suspended Australian dollar (AUD) PayID deposits "with immediate effect" due to a decision made by its third-party payment service provider. It also said that bank transfer withdrawals would also be impacted. According to Binance Australia's statement, its payment processor's partner bank Cuscal had decided to end AUD deposit services for Binance Australia without providing any specific reason. 

In July 2022, FTX, another major crypto exchange, lost its banking partner Signature Bank after the SEC filed a lawsuit against the company for allegedly operating as an unregistered securities exchange. FTX had to suspend its U.S. operations and refund its customers. Signature Bank said it ended its relationship with FTX due to “regulatory concerns” and “reputational risk.”

One of the most high-profile examples of de-banking in the crypto industry is the case of Bitfinex. In 2017, Wells Fargo, one of Bitfinex's banking partners, announced that it would no longer process wire transfers for the exchange. This move left Bitfinex unable to process withdrawals for its users, leading to a significant drop in trading volume and a loss of trust among its user base.

Another example of de-banking in the crypto industry is the case of Coinbase. In 2017, the US-based exchange was forced to suspend trading in Hawaii after failing to secure a banking relationship in the state. This move left Coinbase unable to serve its Hawaiian customers, highlighting the challenges crypto-related businesses face in obtaining banking relationships. 

These debanking cases illustrate some of the challenges and uncertainties that crypto businesses face in the U.S. and Europe, significantly as regulators increase their scrutiny and enforcement actions against the industry. In contrast, regulators and policymakers postulate that debanking is necessary to protect consumers and investors from fraud and risk, but is that their true intention for doing that? If the government had full control over Bitcoin and other altcoins, which gives them enormous control over your financial freedom, would they have aggressively fought against the industry? Think about that.

The Future of De-banking in the Crypto Industry

The future of de-banking in the crypto industry is a topic of much debate and speculation. While it is likely that the de-banking of crypto-related businesses will continue in the coming years, there are also signs that the industry is beginning to adapt to these challenges.

One of how the industry is adapting is by exploring alternative banking relationships. Some of these businesses are beginning to work with smaller banks or payment processors that are more willing to work with them. These alternative banking relationships can help these businesses access the traditional financial system while mitigating cryptocurrency risks.

Some countries are beginning to develop more supportive regulatory frameworks for cryptocurrencies. For example, in the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has started to provide more guidance on the regulatory status of cryptocurrencies, which has helped to clarify the legal landscape for crypto-related businesses.

Similarly, the European Union has developed a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, known as the Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD). This framework requires crypto-related businesses to register with national authorities and comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.

These more supportive regulatory frameworks can mitigate the perceived risks associated with cryptocurrencies, making it easier for banks and other financial institutions to work with crypto-related businesses. These frameworks can build trust in the crypto ecosystem, making it more attractive to mainstream investors and companies.

As the industry continues to evolve, regulators, banks, and crypto businesses must work together to build a more inclusive and supportive financial ecosystem that embraces the potential of digital assets while mitigating the associated risks. By working together, these stakeholders can help to build a more resilient and sustainable financial system that benefits businesses, individuals, and the global economy.